[Report 1969] / Medical Officer of Health, Cosford (Union) R.D.C.
- Cosford (England). Rural District Council.
- Date:
- 1969
Licence: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Credit: [Report 1969] / Medical Officer of Health, Cosford (Union) R.D.C. Source: Wellcome Collection.
20/32 page 9
![TOVi/N AND COUNTRY PLAINING ACT, I968. The Cosford Rural District Council has United delegated povrers only, and the West Suffolk County Council, Shire Hall, Bury St. Ednunds, (Tel No: Bury St, 5;dn\inds, 2281) is the Local Planning --authority under the Act, All applications for developnent v:ithin the Rural District are subnitted to the Cosford Rural District Co\incil and are considered by the Council’s Planning Connittee whose reconnendation is taken into account by the County Planning Departnent, Contravorsial applications are referred to the Sudbury Area Planning Corxiittee which neets monthly. During I969, 287 applications were made for Planning consent, of these 242 were approved and 45 refused, (see table below). In Janua,ry, I968 a report entitled Rural Planning in West Suffolk was issued by the County Planning Officer, Mr. Janes M, Gorst. This report lays down the principles of Rural Planning as seen by the County Planning Authority, and gives details of the likely growth of this, and other Rural Districts in Vifest Suffolk up to 1981, The report is also concerned with the desirability of the preservation and conservation of the character of the countryside of West Suffolk and its historic villages and lays down the Planning principles which must be adopted to achieve this aim. A further comprehensive report Wfest Siaffolk Rural Planning Part 2 has now been issued seeking to classify villages and endeavouring to forecast future growth and development. Parish } No, of Approved] Refused | Applications Alihan 8 8 1 1 Bildeston 11 9 2 Boxford 36 27 9 Brent Eleigh 6 5 1 Brettenhan 5 5 Chelsworth 3 3 Cockfield 13 9 4 Edwardstone' 11 10 1 Elnsett 10 9 1 Groton 9 9 - Hitchan 23 18 5 Kersey 10 8 2 Kettlobaston 1 1 - Lavenhan 61 56 5 Layhan 10 7 3 ' Lindsey 2 2 - Milden 5 4 1 1 Monks Eleigh 13 12 1 Nedging-with-Naughton 11 10 1 Polstead 16 13 3 Preston St, Mary 2 1 1 j Semer 7 7 - Thorpe Morieux 3 1 2 ViTattisham 3 3 - \7hat field 5 3 i Totals;- 2B7 242 45 j 1](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b29124165_0020.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
