Vaccinæ vindicia; or, defence of vaccination : containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination, [&c] / By Robert John Thornton.
- Robert John Thornton
- Date:
- 1806
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: Vaccinæ vindicia; or, defence of vaccination : containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination, [&c] / By Robert John Thornton. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service. The original may be consulted at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service.
![Upon tlie challenge being accepted, and the refutation begun by Dr. Thornton, Dr. Moseley endeavours by abuse to ward off the impression such refutation must effect , . . . -» . ,228 tst. First he states Dr. Thornton's transmutation into a bull 2dly, Th^t Dr. Thornton cannot write with any pro- priety, but uses broken English and bad Grammar 230 Examples of bad Spelling and Grammar in Dr. Mose- ley's book given in an extract from the Rev. Row- land Hill's work fNote,J . . . . ib, 3d]y. That Dr.Thornton is employed and bribed by the Jennerian Society . , . . . .232 4thly, Dr. Moseley,lastly,condescends to use intimidation ib. Dr. Thornton could not help answering the first part of the attack, by punning upon the word Bull , 233 He seriously denies all -the assertions made relative to the connection said tp exist betwixt him and the Royal Jennerian Society . . , , 234 Animadverts particularly on the conduct of Mr. Lips- comb f Note. J . . . . . .235 Claims the merit of haying completely and fairly refuted the several adverse cases published by Doctor Moseley . . . . . . . 23.6 Opinion of Dr, Jenner as to the success of Dr. Thorn- ton's refutation ...... jb, 32. Dr. Rowley again appears, and publishes AN HAMPSTEAD CASE / o . . . 237 First edition of this case , . , , • ib. Second edition of this case . - . . , . ib. Denied by Mr. Bliss, as the inoculation was for the Small-pox . . . . . . .238 Ignorance of Dr. Rowley respef.ting Vaccination proved 24Q The progress of Vaccination stated . . . ibr Refutation of the second edition of this story in a letter Irpm Mr, Bliss » * . , . ,241](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b2135456x_0024.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
