Volume 1

House-flies and how they spread disease / by C.G. Hewitt.

  • Hewitt, C. Gordon (Charles Gordon), 1885-1920.
Date:
1912
    * Camtmtigc: RINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS the exception of the coat of arms at the foot, the design on the title page is a reproduction of one used by the earliest known Cambridge printer, John Siberch, 1521 WELLCcmc nrruTE LIP Y Coll wa’^Omec Cai Mo. Tfdth
    ABOUT eight years ago, on being asked for some AjL information of a special kind regarding the house-fly, I was surprised to find after looking into the matter, that our knowledge of this insect was of the most meagre character. Notwithstanding the fact that it is usually the first animal with which man makes his acquaintance on entering the world and is certainly his most constant companion through life, little attention has been paid to this the com¬ monest of insects. A few studies of its life-history and development had been made in the United States and Germany but there was no accurate information concerning its structure, and the general ignorance of its biology and habits was astonishing, to say the least. In view of this hiatus in our knowledge and the increasing necessity for such information on account of the accumulating evidence as to the disease carrying character of the house-fly, I commenced a study of its structure, development, and biology with especial
    • • • reference to its relation to the dissemination of disease. The results of the greater portion of these studies were published in The Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science in 1907, 1908 and 1909 respectively. During the last two or three years the appreciation of the true nature of the fly in its relation to man has been responsible for the carrying out by numerous workers of a considerable number of investigations on the relation of the house-fly to disease, etc. In this contribution to The Cambridge Manuals of Science and Literature it has been my endeavour to avoid, so far as is possible, the use of technical terms unfamiliar to the lay mind and the inclusion of matter which is of interest chiefly to the specialist. I am indebted to Mr H. T. Giissow, Dominion Botanist, Ottawa, for the photograph of Empusa (fig. 13) and to Mr C. T. Brues of Harvard University for the original photograph of fig. 5. I am responsible for the rest of the illustrations. Through the investigations and educational work of a comparatively few workers, there has been during the last few years an awakening in the mind of the general public, so resolutely indifferent to such matters, of an interest in the fact that the house-fly is something more than an irritant to elderly gentle¬ men and an object of interest to babies. It is now more generally realised that it is a serious menace to the health of the community. This little volume has
    been written in the hope that it will not only bring home to a greater number of people the true nature of the house-fly, but also indicate the means to be taken to eradicate it or render it no longer a menace. It is the scientist s mission to discover the path, but he cannot, after having blazed the trail, make the public follow therein, even though the path be clear and they see the beautiful country beyond. I have frequently been told by people with good intentions that they can do nothing. They can. They plead the indifference or absolute opposition of local authorities to sanitary improvements. Then, I say, elect only those who are pledged to make sanitary changes which will give the children a fair chance and the people healthy surroundings. It can be done and has been done whenever and wherever the people so determine. The educational work necessary is not easy; it is often discouraging. Early in my work the editor of a well-known London weekly journal recommended my incarceration in a lunatic asylum, and another eminent medical man suggested that had I propounded such doctrines a few years ago a commission might have been appointed to inquire into the state of my mind. But it is ever so, and that stage in the history of this doctrine is past. The hostile period is practically over; the indifferent and apathetic period is waning. People can avoid hypotheses but they cannot escape facts. We have
    arrived at the stage where the facts are incontro¬ vertible. Therefore, let there be a more widespread deter¬ mination on the part of the people generally to take the steps or to insist on measures being taken, which our present knowledge of the subject indicates as being necessary, to eradicate, so far as is humanly possible, this potential disease carrier and constant frequenter of filth. Such action will most surely result in a vast improvement in the sanitary conditions of our cities and towns and, by the decrease of in¬ testinal disease, in the health and welfare of the people generally. C. G. H. Ottawa, Canada. April 1912.