The Public Health (London) Act, 1891 : with an appendix containing statutes affecting the metropolis / by Alexander MacMorran and E.J. Naldrett.

  • MacMorran, Alexander.
Date:
1910
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: The Public Health (London) Act, 1891 : with an appendix containing statutes affecting the metropolis / by Alexander MacMorran and E.J. Naldrett. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service. The original may be consulted at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service.

    430/580
    Sched. 3. \_Any of Ihe follomrig orders may he made or a combination of any of them as Ihe cane neevis to reqiiire.l Abatement Now on proof here had before me [or us] that the nuisance so Order. complained of does exist at the said premises [add, ichere the order is made <>7i the jjerson caiisivg the niiimnce, and that the same is caused by the act, default, or sufferance of A. B.], I [or we], in pursuance of the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, do order the said A. B. [or the said owner or occupier] within [specify the time} from the service of this order according to the said Act [here specify the nuisance to he abated, as, for instance, to prevent the premises being a nuisance or injurious or dangei-ous to health, or, for further instance, to prevent the ditch or drain being a nuisance or injurious or dangerous to health] [and state any works to he executed, as, for instance, to whitewash and disinfect the premises, or, for further instance, to dean out the ditch]. Prohibition And I [or we] being satisfied that, notwithstanding the said Order, No. 1. nuisance may be temporarily abated under this order, the same is likely to recur, do therefore prohibit the said A. B. [or the said owner or occupier] from allowing the recurrence of the said or a like nuisance [and for that purpose I or we direct the said A. B. or the said owner or occupier, here specify anyvjorlcs to he executed, as, for instance, to fill up the ditch]. Prohibition Now, on proof here had before me [or us] that at or recently Order, No. 2. before the time of making the said complaint, to wit, on the nuisance so complained of did exist at the said premises, but that the same has since been abated [add, vhere the order is made on the person causing the nuisance, and that the nuisance was caused by the act, default, or sufferance of A. B.], yet, notwithstanding such abatement, I [or we] being satisfied that it is likely that the same or the like nuisance will recur at the said premises, do therefore prohibit [continue as in Prohibition Order, No. 1]. Closinc/' Now, on proof here had before me [or us] that the nuisance Order. is such as to render the dwelling-house [describe the house] situated at [;insert such a description of the situation as may he sufficient to identify the dwelling-house'] unfit in my [or our] judgment for human habitation, I [or we] in pursuance of the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, do hereby prohibit the use of the said dwelling-house for human habitation. Given under the hand and seal of me [or the hands and seals of us, describing the court]. This day of 18 . J. S. (L.S.) J. P. (L.S.) The above order is made under s. 5, ante, p. 25. It must specify the works to be executed if the defcndant_ so requires or if the court considers it desirable. Section 5 (5), ante, p. 25. , ^, . It makes no provision for costs. Apparently it is contemplated that