The Yelverton marriage case : Thelwall v. Yelverton : comprising an authentic and unabridged account of the most extraordinary trial of modern times, with all its revelations, incidents and details : specially reported.
- Avonmore, William Charles Yelverton, Viscount, 1824-1883.
- Date:
- 1861
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: The Yelverton marriage case : Thelwall v. Yelverton : comprising an authentic and unabridged account of the most extraordinary trial of modern times, with all its revelations, incidents and details : specially reported. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by Royal College of Physicians, London. The original may be consulted at Royal College of Physicians, London.
101/198 page 97
![Did you get £10 ?—Xo I i-epeat, have you any recollection of getting money from hpr nf u j bringing i^t. back and retur^ng it to her ?-I^ave no rSectL oH^^^ “ ^ Had she money >vilh her ?—She had Did you see it ?—Not then, Sir WTien did jmu see it ?—That morning before we went to Mr Moonev How much did you see ?—I said that I thought it was £20 bnf- T j not quite sure ef the sum now ’ ' ^ the evidence, and I am Did you take that money at any time to keep for her ’—No 1 don’t i Before you went to the ceremony at Kilone, you id sfeVe Znev o d ^, , ■ —That is my recollection ’ ^ ® money, and were looking at it ? . Was there any mention of the fee the priest was to get before you wont to i i w impression always was that he was to get £20 * chapel ?—Tes, my And that was before you went to the chanel ’ That wnu hofo,.o j. x AThat did you mean by telling me that you were sumrised into chapel Kilrae ?—I did not say I was surprised into the ceremo^ ceremony at the chapel of « hat did you say ?—I said I was surprised into the nature of it but not into it. You ^ew there was to be a ceremony ?-A benediction, I beHeVr ^ ‘ ceremony In a Eoman Catholic place of worship ? True Sir Trulls?’ ^ temple’ dedicated to the service of the Almighty ?- W th^t^fif-’^ a priest of that religion ?—True, Sir medtir rs -t quite blessmg for us ° that Mr. Mooney was to perform this S*™ »« t. .ndo„t„d; ?-That is the meaning I believed thel'rVmonjO-^TL^^ been with the bishop, and he had allowed him to perform You weVUnt“ariT-Yls'^ tr^eT' Ha^vo.? ^®^® ®°™e.respect for it as the house of God ’-Yes Of ®^ ^ reUgion ?—I had. Sir ’ And the priest went, inoi/io ’ -Ygg And the priest went inside ?- And stood before you’ Yes mi r, iiSd 'yo'uSC .’-Sh. did :: F“ >^i tax 7.” “i <''“ “‘0 In sickness or in health ’”—T rlnn’f xi._ ^ou repeated tlmm .’^ Ye^ repeat the words after the priest ?- n*® ‘t—“ we'dded^^ftf’’ P*’i®3t.’—“ I, AVilliam Charles, take thee, Maria Theresa, to be” Well, what are the words .’- -AYe did Perhaps I could'^reminH^* ' recollect them ft*cvp^a, to bo my wedded wifeV”-!Vi>'^ priest said, “ I, William Charles, take tlice, Maria “ 1 O Vin Vn nn/1 4.^ I-.IY „ * **To h?ivG i wiicr les ’ckncBS amHnheaUh^°tm de°iu^^ for worjio, for ‘«n, till death mi do part, ifHoly Church will permit, am] - richer for noorer, in and thereto I pledge thee](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b28408214_0101.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
