The English craft gilds : studies in their progress and decline / by Stella Kramer.

  • Kramer, Stella, 1870-1936
Date:
1927
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: The English craft gilds : studies in their progress and decline / by Stella Kramer. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    22/250 page 4
    dashers, ironmongers, apothecaries, goldsmiths and sometimes even drapers, were growing up at York,^^ Shrewsbury,^® Newcastle-upon- Tyne,^® Dublin,^’^ Southampton,^® Coventry,^® Kingston-upon-Hull,^® Scarborough,^^ Lincoln,^^ Leominster,^® Northampton,®^ Gloucester,®® Rye,®® Bath,®’^ Worcester,®® Hereford,®® Kendal,®® Lynn Regis,®^ Guildford,®® Warwick,®® Winchester,®^ Chester,®® Nottingham,®® Salisbury,®^ Durham,®® Norwich,®® Sandwich,^® Derby,^^ Lichfield,^® Morpeth,^® DoncasterCarlisle,^® Alnwick,^® Preston,^^ Wells,^® Banbury,^® Bridgnorth,®® Leeds,®^ Uttoxeter,®® Youghal,®® Chiches- Drake, Eboracum, vol. i. p. 321. Shropshire Archaeol. and Nat. Hist. Soc. Trans., vol. viii. p. 269. ^^The Merchant Adventurers of Newcastle-upon-Tyne (Surtees Soc.), xciii., p. I. Egerton MS. B. M. 1765, Corporation Records, City of Dublin, f. 10. Davies, History of Southampton, p. 275. Coventry Leet Book, pt. ii. p. 545. 20 Lambert, Two Thousand Years of Gild Life, p. 158. 21 Hinderwell, History of Scarborough, p. 172. 22 Hist. MSS. Comm. Rep., xiv, app. viii, p. 30. 23 Townsend, Leominster, p. 70. 24 Records of the Borough, vol. ii, p. 279. 25 Fosbrooke, Hist, of Gloucester, p. 404. 26 Hist. MSS. Comm. Rep., xii, app. iv, p. 55. 27 King and Watts, Municipal Records, p. 45. 28 Green, Hist, of Worcester, vol. ii. p. 42. 26 Johnson, Ancient Customs of Hereford, p. 118. 36 Hist. MSS. Comm. Rep., x, app. iv, p. 300. Archaeologia, vol. 24, p. 325. Gurney, Extracts from Proceedings of the Corporation of Lynn Regis. Surrey Archaeol. Collections. Stevens, Records and Plate of the Bor¬ ough of Guildford, vol. ix, p. 321. 33 Kemp, The Black Book of Warwick, p. 139. 34 Bailey, Transcripts from Municipal Archives of Winchester, p. 68. The records of Winchester and of other boroughs such as Coventry, Southampton, Lincoln, Guildford, and Lynn Regis, give us no specific information concern¬ ing their mercers’ societies, so that we cannot tell how far they represented amalgamations of different species of trading crafts. We have no reason, however, to suppose that the mercers’ companies recorded in these six com¬ munities differed materially from those established in the other boroughs. 35 Harleian MS. 2054, f. 56. Records of the Borough, vol. iv. p. 311. 37 Hoare, History of Modern Wilts, vol. vi. p. 475. 38 Fordyce, Hist, of Durham, vol. i. p. 345. 36 Records of the City of Norwich, vol. ii. p. 383. Additional MSS. B. M., 27462. Derbyshire Archaeol. and Nat. Hist. Soc. Journ. vol. xv. p. 113. Trans. Royal Hist. Soc., n. s., vol. vii, p. 109. ^3 Mackenzie, Northumberland, vol. ii. p. 192. Records of the Borough, vol. iv. p. 204. 45 Municipal Records of Carlisle, p. 89. 46 Tate, History of Alnwick, vol. ii. p. 321. 47 Abram, Memorials of the Preston Guilds, p. 41. 48 Pari. Papers, vol. 24. p. 1368. 46 Beasley, Hist, of Banbury, p. 477. 56 Skeel, English Historical Review, April, 1920, pp. 244-7. 54 Warded, Hist, of Leeds, p. 34. 52 Redfern, Hist, of Uttoxeter, p. 291. Council-Book,
    digitised image 1
    digitised image 2
    digitised image 3