[Report 1968] / Medical Officer of Health, Cosford (Union) R.D.C.
- Cosford (England). Rural District Council.
- Date:
- 1968
Licence: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Credit: [Report 1968] / Medical Officer of Health, Cosford (Union) R.D.C. Source: Wellcome Collection.
15/32 page 4
![The following table gives details of the water samples taken:- Taken Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Aldhan 1 - 1 Boxford 2 - 2 Brettenham 4 4 - Cockfield 4 1 3 Elmsett 11 7 4 Groton 1 - 1 Kersey 4 2 2 Polstead 1 1 - Preston St. Mary 1 - 1 Semer 2 2 - Whatfield 1 1 — 32 18 14 | j The users of water from an unsatisfactory private supply are advised to boil or otherwise sterilise it before using it for drinking or domestic purposes and if subsequent samples also prove unsatisfactory are urged to connect to public mains where possible. The following table shows the number of properties connected to the mains in each parish. Parish Total No. 4 of houses • h , .] fHouses ’ connected to mains Dependent on Public Standpipe On Route but not connected Not on Route of Mains Aldhan 56 54 2 Bildeston 305 303 - 2 - Boxford 322 314 - - 8 Brent Eleigh 60 52 - 2 6 Brettenham 101 101 - - - Chelsworth 55 51 — 2 2 Cockfield 274 259 - 9 6 Edwardstone 123 113 - - 10 Elmsett 173 158 - 10 9 Groton 78 70 - 3 5 Hitchan 222 201 11 1 9 Kersey 156 150 - - 6 Kettlebaston 24 23 - - 1 Lavenhan 645 639 - 1 5 Layhan 202 180 - 7 15 Lindsey 62 54 4 — 4 Milden 48 48 - - - Monks Eleigh 167 155 - 3 9 Nedging-with-Naughton 109 103 5 - 1 Polstead 256 226 2 7 21 Preston St. Mary 72 62 — 10 Semer 54 50 - 1 3 Thorpe Morieux 90 90 - - - Wattisham 44 V+ - - | Whatfield j 91 88 2 . 1 Totals 3,789 94.6^ 0.6% 1.35*2 ! 5-5%](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b29124153_0015.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
