On normal growth under systematized exercise in the gymnasium / by Henry G. Beyer.
- Beyer, Henry Gustav, 1850-1918.
- Date:
- [between 1890 and 1899]
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: On normal growth under systematized exercise in the gymnasium / by Henry G. Beyer. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by The Royal College of Surgeons of England. The original may be consulted at The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
3/14 page 113
![Table of lung capacities in kilos. A. No. Age. Lung c; First measure- ment. ipacity. Second measure- ment. Gain. 1 17.4 4.558 5. 900 1.312 2 20.1 4.177 4.588 .411 3 17.1 2. 949 3.277 .328 4 19.10 4.588 4.588 0 5 19. 10 4. 505 4. 669 . 164 6 15.4 4. 096 4. 341 .245 7 17 3. 768 3. 849 .082 8 17.10 4.915 5.078 .163 9 17.8 4. 260 4. 588 .328 10 17.9 4. 096 4. 260 . 164 11 16 3. 605 4. 096 .491 12 16.5 2. 866 3. 277 .411 13 17.6 3.113 3. 686 .572 14 19.1 4.096 4. 260 . 164 15 17 4.260 4. 260 0 16 17.10 3. 277 3. 849 .572 17 15.11 2. 621 3. 030 .409 18 16.6 3. 768 4. 096 .328 19 18. 11 4.424 4. 752 .328 20 18.2 5. 900 6. 226 .328 21 18.9 3. 768 3. 932 .164 22 15.5 ' 3. 441 4. 260 .819 No. Age. Lung cs First measure- ment. ipacity. Second measure- ment. Gain. 23 15.11 3. 277 3. 768 .491 24 17.8 3. 605 3. 605 0 25 18.1 4. 588 4. 752 .164 26 19.9 5. 408 6. 063 .655 27 19 3. 932 3. 932 0 28 17.5 3. 277 3.441 .164 29 19.8 4. 260 5.230 .970 30 17.1 4.096 4. 260 . 164 31 18.3 4.424 4. 424 0 32 17.3 2. 949 4.260 1.311 33 18 3.441 4.424 .983 34 19.10 5. 408 5.572 .164 35 16. 10 4. 424 5. 571 1.147 36 18.8 3. 768 4. 260 .492 37 17.9 3.768 4. 588 .820 38 18.1 4.096 4.588 .492 39 17 3. 605 4. 096 .491 40 18.10 3. 277 3.605 .328 41 16.3 2. 866 3.277 .411 42 19.7 3.768 4. 096 .328 Averages. 18 3.950 4. 350 .400 B. Number. Age. Lung capacity. Gain. Number. Age. Lung capacity. Gain. First examina- tion. Second examina- tion. First examina- tion. Second examina- tion. 43 17 3.277 3. 605 0.328 60 18.10 4. 096 4. 260 0.164 44 17.7 3. 768 3. 932 . 164 61 18. 2 4. 260 4.915 . 655 45 17.11 4.424 4.424 0 62 * 20. 5 4. 260 4.260 0 46 19.10 4. 260 4. 505 .244 63 16.4 3. 686 4.260 .574 47 16.7 4.915 4.833 . 081 64 19.2 4. 424 4.424 0 48 20. 7 * 3. 768 3. 686 .081 65 .. 19. 6 4 260 4. 341 . 081 49 17. 6 4. 505 4. 505 0 66 ... 17.3 5.408 6. 063 . 655 50 18.6 5. 244 5. 489 .244 67 18. 8 3. 605 4. 096 .492 51 20 3.113 3. 113 0 68 16. 5 4. 260 4.752 . 492 52 17.9 4. 588 4. 752 . 164 69 20 3. 932 4. 096 . 164 53 16.11 4. 096 4. 341 .244 70 ... 19. 6 3. 441 3. 605 .164 54 18.4 4. 096 4.341 .244 71 18. 7 4. 013 4.177 . 164 55 19. 5 2.785 3. 277 .492 72 18. 2 3. 768 3.277 .491 56 17. 6 4. 588 4. 505 . 082 73 18. 3 3. 768 3. 768 0 57 15.6 2. 785 3.441 . 655 74 ... 18.4 3.113 3.277 . 164 58 17 9. 3 7fi8 3 7fi8 o 59 16] 10 2. 785 2.866 .082 Averages. 18 4 4.160 .160 Total strength.—On examining the two total-strength tables of last year we find that the 50 cadets on their entrance examination developed an average total strength of 385 kilos, and at their second examination, or six months later, this average total strength was 508^ kilos, showing a gain of 123| kilos, which was the largest gain ever noted at the Academy. This year the 74 cadets developed at the tirst examina- tion an average total strength of 422 kilos and at the second examination 528, show- ing a semiannual increase of 108 kilos. 6313 M s 8](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b22331463_0005.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
