Redgrave's Factories Acts / by Alexander Redgrave.

  • United Kingdom
Date:
1931
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Redgrave's Factories Acts / by Alexander Redgrave. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    21/842
    PAGE Owen v, Parry (1914), 79 J. P. 64; 12 L. G. R. 1228 See ws 388 Owner v. Beehive Spinning Co., Limited, [1914] 1 K. B. 105; 78 d. P. 16; $3 L. J. K. B, 282; 109 L. T.. 800; 30 T.L. BR. 21; 23 Cox C. C. 626; 12 L. Conan. 194 v. Cottingham Sanitary Steam Laundry Co., Limited (1910), 74:52. 219 = 102 L.-¥, 571 Bae 217 v. Hooper (1903), 67 J. P. 406; 89 L. T. 130 ; 20 Cox C. C. 518 . 346 bad O50 King & Sons, Tuimited, [19221 W. N. 283 ; 86 Jocks 2482 F238. F307: 39 T. L. R. 22; 67 Sol. Jo. 97; 101. G Re 791 A. 3 Si 5 ae ... 489 ie Pacific Steam Navigation Co. v. Pugh & Sons oa): 7 Sa iad Oe 3 622 . 134 Palmer’s Shipbuilding Co. 2. Chaytor (1869), bh Q. 3 209 ; 10°B & SS 4705 38i. J. MM Cn638- 19 I 7, 038: 17 W. R. 401 . Tee ey ss Patent Agents’ Institute v. Lockwood, [1894] A. C. B47 ; 63 L. J. P. C, 74; 71 L. T. 205; 6 R. 219; 21 Rettie (H. L) 61 193, 391 Paterson v. Duke (1904), 6 Fraser (J. C. ) 53 eae BOD: ——— v. Hunt (1909), 73 J. P. 496; 101 L. T. By he 217, 219 Patrick Thomson, Limited v. Somerville, [1917] 8. C. (J.) 3 moos Pearce v. Lansdowne (1893), 57 J. P. 760; 62 L. J. Q, B. 441; 69 EB. T. 316 ae 361 Pearson v. Belgian Mills Co., [1896], A Q. B. 244 ; “60.4. 2 181; 65 L. J. M. C. 48; 74. T, 101; 44 W. R. 334; 18 Cox C. C. 241. 33 Peek v. Waterloo Board of Health (1863), 2H. & C. 709 ; “33 Mea M. C. 11; 9 L. T. 338; 12 W. R,.252; 9 Jur. (Nn. s.) 1343 229 Pegram »v, Dixon (1886), 51 ce. 198 ; 55 L. Ji Q. B. 447 see 2 4O Peter Robinson, Limited v. Plowden (1908), 67 J. P. 152 Seg ovale Petrie v. Weir (1900), 2 Fraser, 1041 : Sadi, ke Phillips v. London School Board, [1898] 2 Q. ‘B. 447 ; 671. J. Q. B. 874; 79 L. T. 50; 46 W. R. 658 ; 147. L.B.501 ... 354 v. M’ Innes (1874), 2 Rettie, 224 aa a 300 Pillase: Llynvi Coal Co. (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 752 ; $8 L, J. OP. 294; 20 T.'T. 923 3 U7W.. a F123... .. 9865, 360 Plant v. Wright & Co., [1905] I K. B. 353; 74 toe kB 3al ; 92 L. T. 720 ; 53 W. R. 358; 21 T. L, ’R. 217 ne 138 Plumstead Board of Works v. British Land Oo. (1875), Lec R. 10 Q. B. 203; 44 L. J. Q. B. 38; 32 L. T. 94; 23 W. R. 634 . sa Gt “i sey one Jos, OW Pope v. Whalley (1865), GBs -é 6. 303; 34.1. J, Ms Co 76; 11 L. T. 769; 13 W. R. 402; 11 Jur. N.S. 444 a 402 Poplar Revenue Officer v. Union Lighterage Co. (1930), 46 T. L. B. 601 (C. A.) ... eu ole — Union v. Martin (1904), 63 J. P. 526 : 91 L. T. 550 we «804 Prance v. London County Council, [1915] 1 K. B. 688; 79 J. P. 242; 84L. J. K, B. 623; 112 L. T. 820; 24 Cox O. C. 684; 31 T. L. R. 128; 13 L. G. R. 382 be sid .. 403 Pringle v. Grosvenor (1894), 21 Rettie, 532 . - ; ... 204 Prior v. Slaithwaite Spinning Co., [1898] 1 Q. 'B. 881 ; 61 J. P. 358; Es iat ee 78 L. T. 532 ; 46 W. R. 488; 19 Cox C. C. A 7 er See ‘ ci aatiege ?
    digitised image 1
    digitised image 2
    digitised image 3