A history of mathematics / [Florian Cajori].

  • Florian Cajori
Date:
1897
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: A history of mathematics / [Florian Cajori]. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    25/444 page 7
    Not to be overlooked is the fact that in the sexagesimal nota- tion of integers the “principle of position” was employed. Thus, in 1.4 (=64), the 1 is made to stand for GO, the unit of the second order, by virtue of its position with respect to the 4. The introduction of this principle at so early a date is the more remarkable, because in the decimal notation it was not introduced till about the fifth or sixth century after Christ. The principle of position, in its general and syste- matic application, requires a symbol for zero. We ask. Did the Babylonians possess one? Had they already taken the gigantic step of representing by a symbol the absence of units ? Neither of the above tables answers this question, for they happen to contain no number in which there was occasion to use a zero. The sexagesimal system was used also in fractions. Thus, in the Babylonian inscriptions, ^ and |- are designated by 30 and 20, the reader being expected, in his mind, to supply the word “sixtieths.” The Greek geom- eter Hypsicles and the Alexandrian astronomer Ptolemseus borrowed the sexagesimal notation of fractions from the Babylonians and introduced it into Greece. From that time sexagesimal fractions held almost full sway in astronomical and mathematical calculations until the sixteenth century, when they finally yielded their place to the decimal fractions. It may be asked. What led to the invention of the sexagesi- mal system ? Why was it that 60 parts were selected ? To this we have no positive answer. Ten was chosen, in the decimal system, because it represents the number of fingers. But nothing of the human body could have suggested 60. Cantor offers the following theory : At first the Babylonians reckoned the year at 360 days. This led to the division of the circle into 360 degrees, each degree representing the daily amount of the supposed yearly revolution of the sun around the earth. Now they were, very probably, familiar with the
    digitised image 1
    digitised image 2
    digitised image 3