Metallographia: or, an history of metals. Wherein is declared the signs of ores and minerals both before and after digging, the causes and manner of their generations, their kinds, sorts and differences; with the description of sundry new metals, or semi metals, and many other things pertaining to mineral knowledge. As also, the handling and shewing of their vegetability, and the discussion of the most difficult questions belonging to mystical chymistry, as of the philosophers gold, their mercury, the liquor alkahest, aurum potabile, and such like / Gathered forth of the most approved authors that have written in Greek, Latine, or High-Dutch; with some observations and discoveries of the author himself. By John Webster.
- John Webster
- Date:
- 1671
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: Metallographia: or, an history of metals. Wherein is declared the signs of ores and minerals both before and after digging, the causes and manner of their generations, their kinds, sorts and differences; with the description of sundry new metals, or semi metals, and many other things pertaining to mineral knowledge. As also, the handling and shewing of their vegetability, and the discussion of the most difficult questions belonging to mystical chymistry, as of the philosophers gold, their mercury, the liquor alkahest, aurum potabile, and such like / Gathered forth of the most approved authors that have written in Greek, Latine, or High-Dutch; with some observations and discoveries of the author himself. By John Webster. Source: Wellcome Collection.
![2fo of petals'. and the Wifdom of Egypt, were in Solomons time ac¬ counted the greated that then was known, and that Solomons excelled them both; then it cannot ratio¬ nally be conceived that cither of them were defective in the mod noble parts, either of Natural Philofophy, or the Art of Medicine drawn from the Mineral King-, dom, nor the Art of Tranfmutation, but that they underdood both. 2. Ariftotle, (accounted the Princeof Learning , and of as much Antiquity as the mod Authors we have) would never have fo much commended the Egyptians and Babylonians for the truth of their Do- drine concerning the Stars; but if they were fo well verfed in the nature of things fo remote as the Stars , they mud (in all probability) be as much (if not bet¬ ter) skill’d in the knowledge of the nature of the fub- terraneous Kingdom. 3. Cicero, a perfon that writ above 1600 years fince, would never have fo remarkably taken notice of Pythagoras, D-emecriius , and Plato for travelling into the remoted Regions, and efpecially into Egypt] thcjy knowing the height of the Grecian Learning, and being therein, by the account of all Authors, the chiefed Maftcrs, if there had not been fome excellen¬ cy in the Egyptian Learning that they were ignorant of. And what could that be except the Art of Tranf- muring of Metals, and of curing dileafes in a more perfed way then the Grecians knew * amongd whom norwithdanding the tAlfcuUpian Family had been fa¬ mous many hundred years before the time of Pytba- goras% and thofe that followed him and their going • down into Egypt ? ° 4* And if Egypt was (according to Macrobltts and \ the](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b3032399x_0038.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)


