Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James.

  • Great Britain
Date:
1958
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    22/596
    PAGE Neale v. Del Soto, [1945] 1 All E.R. 191 (C.A.); [1945] K.B. 144; 114 L.J.K.B. 138; 172 L.7...653> 61% TiLiRs: 1453, 86. Sol. -fo.; 130; 131 Digestawnenm 646, 7508 .. See Be :. .. 194, 305 Newhill Compulsory ‘Purchase Order, 1937, Re, Payne’ s Application, [1938] 2All Kok, 16387 1O2s|aP.. 2935 562 Sol. Jo. 375; sub nom. Payne v. Minister of Health -158 £23523 5530 1.4 200 : 347 Nisbet and Potts’ Contract, Re, [1906] 1 Ch. 386 (C.A. ys 75 ‘Tse je Ch. 238; 22ol: Lak. 223%) 502501! Jo. TQO1s) 19. Digest-205 55.7) 270 Northwood v. London County Council, [1926] 2 K.B. 411; 95 1 J KuBi 862; 135 L.T. 159; 90. J:P. 128};:42, T.L.R: 508 ;.24 L.G.Ril 415% .0ni appeabaroa2 ai 96 L. J. KB. 520 (C.A.);, Digest Supp. a a iz Be Ai 151 Northwood v. London County Council (No. 2) (1927), 96 L.J.K.B. 520 (C.A.); 137 L.Ts49; 91.J.P..93% 43 T.L.R.2347 ;- 25, LG: Ri254 5 on Digest hep, BAT LCOR overs ae ne Sat 28) eas 151 Nutter v. Accrington Local Board of Health (1878), 4 Q.B.D. 375. (C:AL)3 148 L.J.Q.B. 487; 40 L.T. 802; 43 J.P. 635; on appeal sub nom. Accrington Corporation v. Nutter (1880), 43 L.T. 710 (H.L.); 42 Digest 6S0r oro see 302 O Offer v. Minister of Health, [1936] 1 K.B. 40 (C.A.); 105 L.J.K.B. 6; 153 L.T. 270; 51 I.L.R. 546; 79 Sol. Jo.’609; 33 L.G.R: 369; Digest Sapp. eee oF Nez @ 1) 2 294, 345 Paddington Borough Council v. Finucane, [1928] Ch. 567; 97 L.J. Ch. 219; 139 L.T. 368} 92 ].P-08;. 26, L:G IR: 238337 Digest supp eae 54 Palmer v. Minister of Housing and Local Government and Romford Corpora. . tion (1952), 3 P. & C.R. 165 (C.A.); 3rd Digest Supp. 340 Palmer and Harvey, Ltd. v. Ipswich piss nes (1953), 4 P, 64Gre 5; 3rd Digest Supp. x 48 o ys sf I51 Palser v. Grinling, Property Holding Co., Ltd. v. Mischeff, [1948] 1 All ERAT (HL) [1643 cA.Cr20n; (1945) if J.R. 6005. 64 ;L. Rize O2sc0L nie 537.138 Digest (Repl.) 651, 7542 ae ay oe “t ft: a3 45 Parry v. Harding, [1925] 1 K.Bs:1115,.04 L.J.KB)375 132s sco; eae tog; =4iel.L.Real; 6oe50l-s)o. 1p2ze joe LG 773: 31 Digest (Repl.) 716, 80090... be =] # 274 Payne v. Cardiff Rural District Council, [1932] 1 KB. 241; goo ly. |.K.Bee@26- _ 145 L.T. 575; 95 J.P. 173; 47 T.L.R. 532; 29 L.G.R. 507; Digest Supp. 54 Payne v.. Haine. (1847), 16,M.,& W. 5415..16 L. J. Exetg0em3 do.1.0 Sse 11 J.P. 462; 31 Digest (Repl.) 359, 4895 at L. 169 Peek v. Waterloo and Seaforth Local Board of Health (1863), 2H. &C. F700; 8, NewiKepa 13ts 33: Lu). MCeitss9 Lil §ss5 7a 807} 2 9ad0e N.S. 1344; 12 W.R. 252; 38 Digest 177, 194 107 Pertwee v. Townsend, [1896] 2 Q.B. 129; 65 L. i Q.B. 659; 75 TRG 104; 39 Digest. 206, 00%. .< ee 63 Pinson and Richards v. Bristol Corporation (195 5), 5 P. & C. R. 282... 342 Point of Ayr Collieries, Ltd. v. Lloyd-George, [1943] 2 All E.R. 540 (C. A); 11 Digest (Repl.) 619, 469 377 Pomeroy v. Malvern Urban District Council (1903), 89 Ete 5553 “67 J.P. 375; 19 T.L-R. 507; 1 L.G.R. 825; .20 Cox; C.C. 572; 38 Digest 107, 420-5 266 Pound v. Plumstead Board of Works (1871), Takes 7 Q.B. 183; 41.4.5 MiG. gpa 25 L.T. 461; 36 J.P. 468; 29 W.R.177; 42 Digest 680, 977 af: opie sO? Premier Garage Co. v. Ilkeston Corporation (1933), 97 J.P. Jo. 786 .. #5 EiLAwBOS.— Price,v., Minister of Health, [1947] 1.All E.R: 47j..[1947) 1 [ahs 2615s tee 305; 111,J.P.)56;, 63 T.L.R..9; 45,L,G.R.13;, 2nd. Digest Suppesrenased iy eae Proudfoot.v. Hart (1890), 25. 0.B.D.,42.(C.A.);» 59 L.J.0.B2 3305563 la as 1715 55 J.P..20; 38 W.R. 730; 6.1.L.R. 305; 31 Digest (Repl.) 350;.4000) 41,109 R R. v. Bedfordshire County Council, Ex parte Sear, [1920] 2 K.B. 465; 89 L.J.K°B. 425;°°123 L-T..50; 84° ].P.°973* 36 1 LOR. 360) Si Sci Ga eee 11 Digest (Repl.) 310, 2169 : te of a ae - 3. 207, 345 Rk. v. Bishirgian, [1936] 1 All E.R. 586 (Ge C. A. 5.154 L.T. 400; 52.1 a ee 30 Cox, C.C. 379; 25 Cr. App. Rep. 176; 15 Digest (Repl) ss 11,076 Igl i age Borley (1844),.8. J.P. 263; 15 Digest (Repl.) 1213) 72,347. ts 421 R. v. Comptroller General of Patents, Ex parte Bayer Products, Ltd., [1941] 2 ALL EK. 6977 (CoA): ro4r) 27 1. 300: Sir tga, a ee 165 Lae 278; 50-RIP.C 251, 47 Digest (Repl.) 476,276 ate nee 377 R. v. Edwards, Ex parte Joseph, [1947] 1 All E.R. 314; [1947] K. B. 302; [1947] L.j.R. 538; 111 J.P..163; 45 L.G:R. 79; 2nd Digest Siipp, 221 R. v. Electricity Commissioners, Ew parte London Electricity Joint Committee Co. (1920), Ltd., [1924] 1 K.B. 171 (CA.):. 93 L:). Kee, tao eee £64;).83 12. 13; 39,1.L.R..715; 68 Sol; Jo. 188; 21, L.GiR Vig, igieees Supp. Ms 167, 321, 345 R. v. Falmouth Borough Council (1953), unreported . ee ag 38