Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James.

  • Great Britain
Date:
1958
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    24/596
    38 Digest 196, 327 PAGE R. v. Wandsworth District Board of Works (1858), 6 W.R. 576; a4 Digest FE7 L300 ~~. 95 R. v. Wimbledon Justices, Ex parte Derwent, [1953] 1 All E.R. 390; [1953] tO. Br+3805'* 17 hE erg 7 aol apo: tr iO, eat te ee i 433) 74 aaa Supp. : a s 22 R. v. Winter (1815), Russ. & RY 229515 Digest ‘(Repl.) 1233, 12 350. 421 Rawlence v. Croydon Corporaton, [1952] 2 All E.R. 535 (C.A.); [1952] 2 0.B. 809; -bi0 Jor 575-115 202 et are ae 96 Sol. Jo. 530; 50 L:G.R. 576; 3rd Digest Supp. a e Er: Bi 108 Rayner v. Stepney Corporation, [1911] 2 Ch. 312; 30 Ly]. Chi o7@, rose. ae 362; 75 J.P. 468; 29 T.L.Ro 512% to LG: R.907) 938 Digest 21a ae 74, 104 Richards v. Swansea Improvements and Tramways Co. (1878), 9 Ch. D. 425 (C.A.); 38 L.T..833; 43 J.P! 174; 26 W.R.°764; 11 Digest (Repl) 193; 596 305 Richardson v. Minister of Housing and Local Government (1956), 8 P. & C.R 204 cas a os bs = a oe 3 3 Ripon (Highfield) Housing Order, 1938, Re, Applications of White and Collins, of [1939] 3 All E.R. 548 (C.A.); sub nom. Ripon (Highfield) Housing Order, 1938, Re, White and Collins v. Minister of Health, [1939] 2 K.B. 838; 108 L.J.K-B.' 768; 261 TT? 109; 103) P9331 59°55 Ti toe ee see 622; Digest Supp. = .s re <7 me raf 344 Roberts v. Charing Cross, etc. Rail. Co. (1903), 87 Lb) 732; ro 1 ee 42 Digest 723, 1423 os #3 Ne rid 4; 164 Roberts v. Hopwood, [1925] hy c. 578 (EL, L); 94 L:j..K.B: 542; £33 bake ogee 89 J.P: 105%) 49 DRY 364 4607 S0l-w10.. 4978 oe te ee 33 Digest 20, 83 . . 95, 345 Robertson v. King, [1907] 2 K. 1B: 265; 605 vi Pe 453: 70 vs iS: B. 630; 84 eA pad 842; 49 WIR 542 +45 Sol. [0;/448 5738 Digest 2127407 ‘bye Robins & Sons, Ltd. v Minister of Health, Re, Brighton (Everton Place Area) Housing Order, 1937, [1938] 4 All E.R. 446 (C.A.); [1939] 1 K.B. 520; 108 DORR B28 re 200. Te RIS vase tre 33 55. P.L.R.134;*82 Sol.’ Jo. Gao; 37 LARK. 244 Divestisupp can ee 3 on ae: Se 115 Robinson v. Barton-Eccles Local Board (1883), 8 App..Cas.798 ‘(EES 54°. J. Ch.:226; 50 L..12573 448 %).P. 276% 224 tyedG eee p1eese 269, 56 302 Robinson v. Sunderland Corporation, [1 899] iy OF B. 751; 68 L. ‘a Bi oe 330; 80 L.T. 262; 63 J-P.-3453 15 T-L.Rowg5;. 19 Cox, G. Cl 245.48 iivest 1 eee 377 Rodwell v. Minister of Health, [1947] 1 All E.R. 80; [1947] K.B. 404; [1947] L:J.R.°568> 176°L..> 193; 218i) .Ps 925 (OF TE Loa eg eo ee 45 L.G.R. 60; 2nd Digest Supp. M. & + -- 202, 248, 346 Rogers v. Hosegood, [1900] 2 Ch. 388 (C. A. \*°69_L. J. Chvt65 2. Ba ae. ee 48 W.R. 650; 16 T.L.R. 489; 44 Sol. Jo. 607; 35 Digest 342, 846.. a 270 Rogers v. Hyde, [1951] 2 All E.R. 79 (C.A.); [1951] 2 K.B. 923; 95 Sol. Jo. 483; “Digest Supp... 395 Rollo v. Minister of Town and Country Planning, [1948] 1 AIE.R. 1 3 (C.A. ): [1948] L.J-R. 817; ‘112, J:P. 104; 64°1.L:R.25;-092 Solx]o: 40; 7O Ge 114; 2nd Digest Supp. .. ed oe ae a 67, 178, 264, 377, 454 Roots v. Beaumont (1886), 51 J.P. 197; 38 Digest 209, 437 .. re aa 102 Ross and Leicester Corporation, Re (1932), a Pee 459: 30° 15.GraR 4G ae Digest Supp. 2) | Sty, See sag Rousou v. Photi (Gort Estates coy “Third Party), [1940] 2 AIE.R. 529 (CoA a [1040]: ee 2370 Vs 0G ise K.B. 693° “163 L/L 725) TOt Ma eee T.L.R. 685; 84 Sol. Jo. 488; 38 L.G.R. 364; 31 Digest. (Repl.) 1990, 33r0 45 Ryall v. Cubitt Heath, [1922] 1 K.B. 275; 91 L.J.K.B. 189; 126 L.T. 359; 86 J.P. 15:3°39 T.L.R..123; 66 Sol. Joo142;' 20 LGR 5G; 3a igesr ore, . 498 7 oF: t7 we aa K: se ve «a 50, 67, 280 Ryall v. Kidwell & Son, [1914] 3 K.B. 135 (C.A.); 83 L.J.K.B. 1140; 111 L.T. 2407 78 J.P. 377; 30 T.L OR. 5033) 12 [°G Ri9075 31 Diteet nie 367, 5 ieo ea isi ote 5% he te ote “9 - ae 44 Ss St. Helen’s (Mayor) v. Kirkham (1885), 16 Q.B.D, 403; pe J.P.:64750034, Wie 440; 26 Digest 551, 2468 es a a 107 St. James and Pall Mall Electric Light Co., Ltd. v. R. prec 73. Ley ae: 518; 9046; [313445 /08-JePi288 jas Digest SIN 294 is 164 St. Leonard, Shoreditch Vestry v. London County Council, [1895] 2 QO. B. 1043. 64 /LAJ.Q.B. 6453! 72 .L.T + 8027 ..59..)..B. 042350 43) Sooreeme T.L.R. 420; 39 Sol. Jo. 539; 15 R. 516; 11 Digest (Repl.) 109, 53.. i 311 Salford Corporation v. Hale, [1925] 1 K.B. 503 (C.A.); 94 L.J.K.B. 326; 132 L.T..320; 89 J.P..19;..41 1.0:R: 25739¢602SaL is 1925 :23'L.G.Ri266; 38 Digest 215, 496 .. Nz 54 Salisbury Corporation v. Roles, [1948] W.N. 412; 92 Sol. Jo. “618 é 3, 49, 299 Salt. v. Scott, Hall, [1903] 2iK.B. 245; 72\LJ].K.B. 162730 838 12h: 868: 67 J}. P, 30630 52-Wi Ra fos rig Liliks Sie i. L.G.R.: 753 j020 Coxa GG. age : 0h ne 5 ie - 266