Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James.

  • Great Britain
Date:
1958
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    25/596
    ———— Supp. PAGE Salter v. Lask, [1925] 1 K.B. 584; 94 L.J.K.B. 522; 132 L.T. ae he ase tg Bede 8 2013223 Gi: 327; 31 Digest (Repl.) 663, 7635 =... 182 Sander’s Will Trusts, Le, Public Trustee v. McLaren, [1954] I “All E, R. 667; [1954] Ch. 265; 98 Sol. Jo. 196; 3rd Digest Supp.. 47, 139, 446 Saner v. Bilton (1878), 7 Ch. D. 815; 47 os Ch. 267; 38 Em 28r: 26 W.R. 394; 31 Digest (Repl.) 379, 5077 169 Schwerzerhof v. Wilkins, [1898] 1 O.B. 640: 67 i [é Q. B. 476: 78 Per: 229; G2) hr. 247,019 Cox, CC, 22; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1070, 299 . 152, 352 Scottish Widow’s Fund v. Craig (1882), po Ch. Dk.2087) 51-L De Ch. 363; 30 W.R. 463; 39 Digest 203, ag 2 Ss 63 Searle v. Cooke (1890), 43 Ch. D. 519 (C.A.); 590 L.J. Ch. 259; 62 L.T: 2t; 39 Digest 205, 954 . 63 Sheffield (Burgesses) v. Minister of Health, [193 5] All E. R. Rep. 7033 I 154 L. a 183; 100: J.P.i99; 52: 7T.L:R: sae 80 Sol. Jo. 16; 34 L,G.R. 62; Digest a aon oe ai ne ba .. 116, 344 Shelley v. London Gonrlty Cowell. See London County Council v. Shelley shuréey, Re, Savory v. Shurey, [1918] 1 Ch, 263; 87 L.J. Ch. 245; 118 L.T. 355; 34 P Leat Pye; G2 GOl- 14092465. 28 Dibest 140, 72°. ts 179 Sidebotham, Re, Ex parte Sidebotham (1880), 14 Ch. D. 458 (CA); 49 L.J: Boy, feeders 26 AV Re tk 4 Digest 225.2774. Ps 56 Sills v. Watkins, [1955] 3 All E.R. 319 (C.A.): Og Sole Jo. 76rS 53 TIGR 672; std ‘Digest Stipp.. «i Deed Tiss A? ce mis th 195 Slight v. Portsmouth Corporation (1906), G5 4 L505 FU 590674 “635; 38 Digest 212, 468 ie a ie Me a. a 305 Smith v. Cardiff Corporation, [1953] 2 PAY rived S7 3c), 1 tO5al ty, Gb. 210; 118 J.P. 33; 97 Sol. Jo. 831; 52 L.G.R.1; 3rd Digest Supp. Pah 231 Smith v. Cardiff Corporation, [1955] 1 All E.R. 113; [1955] Ch. 159; 119 J.P. 128; 99 Sel. J0: 76;-43 L.G.R. 176; 3rd Digest Supp.. no Ve Smith v. East Elloe Rural District Council, [1956] I All E; R. 855 (HLL): [1956] A.C: 736; 120 ei Saar rao Sul. JO. 2625 54 LGR. 2395 31d Digest Supp. = a49, 3777 300 Smith v. Marrable (1843), 11 M. & W. 5: ‘Car. & M. 479; 12 L.T. Ex. yp 7 Jur. 70; 31 Digest (Repl.) 195, 3266. ; 44 Solomons v. Gertzenstein (R.), Ltd., [1954] 1 All E.R. 1008: [1954] O.B. 565; 98 Sol. Jo. 270; 163 Estates Gazette 296; on appeal, [1954] 2 All E.R, 625 (C.A.); [1954] 2Q.B. See ie Sol. tke 539; 5? L.G.R. 433; ie Digest Supp. 107 Somerset v. Wade, 1894] I O. bw alleys) f Pa2sh se 03 ia apy MC. 126; 70 LT. wee de Wik. 3909; 10 1.L:R. 313; fo K. 105; 30 Digést (Repl.) 95, 709. 68 Southam, Re, Ex pavie Lamb (1881), 19 Ch. D. 169 (C.A.); 51 L.J. Ch. ae 45 L.T. 639; 30 W.R. 126; 4 Digest 532, 4876 . 58 Soward v. Leggatt (1836), 7 C. & P. 613; 31 Digest (Repl.) 361, 4926. : 169 Stack v. Church Commissioners for pane [1952] FLAME Pe 3 2 (C. A); 116 J.P. 334; 3rd Digest Supp. : 280 Stafford v. Minister of Health, [1946] K. B. G2T; 15 L.J.K.B. 476: ‘Ito re 210; 90 Sol. Jo. 260; 44 TGR: 231; sub nom. Re Mowsley No. 1 Com- pulsory Purchase Order, 1944, 175 Litepior) 62) 1b. 454 and Digest Supp. tes ipatel e2O4 sn 40 Stanton v. Southwick, rigz6T 2 K. B. 33: Phe i I. K. B. 4eee 123 L.T.. 651; oe {P2077 36 RR! ped 4 Sol. Ao 4925 18 eG ts. 473 3 ater (Repl.) 198, 3303 45 State, The (Wood) v. West ge Bows of Edealihe and ae nau cients a Minister for Local Government and Public Health, [1936] I.R. 4or. 345 Steele v. Minister of Housing and Local Government (1956), 6 P. & C. R. 386; Times, 6th July (C.A.) .. 37, sett 333, 348 Stevens and Steads, Ltd. and Evans v. King, [1943] 1 AN E.R. 314 41 L.G.R 108; 2nd Digest Supp. -. IQI Stewart v. Chapman, [1951] 2 All E. R. 613; [1951] F 3 K. B. 792: II5 i? P, 4733 [1951)2 T.L.R. 640; 95 Sol. Jo. 641; 49 L.G.R. 816; 35 Gr. App. sek 102; 2nf Digest Supp. 6, 185, 205 Stidworthy and Stidworthy U. Brixham Urban District Council; [193 5} L.J.C.C.R. 41 66, 67 Strood Estates Co., Ltd. v. ees 2936} 2 KB. Bak: (H. L); 2937] 3 All E.R. 656; affirmed, [1938] A.C. 118; 106 L.J.K.B. 752; 157 L.T. 338; 53 reedk.073 3. Si Sol. 76.740: - 31 Digest (Repl.) 667, 7660.. 45 Summerfield v. Hampstead Borough Council, [1957] 1 All E.R. 221; “121 J: P. 72; 101 Sol. Jo. 111; 55 L.G.R. 67; 168 Estates Gazette 698 2 228; 231 Summers v. Minister of Health, [1947] 1 All E.R. 184; 176 L.T. 237; Itt J.P. 865° 45 1aG.R. 105; ond Digest Supp. -. 21T, 294, 349 Summers v. Salford Corporation, [1943] 1 All E. R. 68 (HL. L, ys; [1943] A.C. 283; Tia tom Gye eee In Ti67 -:r07 J)P 35 po 59 TER. eee 86 Sol. Jo. 391;