Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James.

  • Great Britain
Date:
1958
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Housing : being the annotated texts of The Housing Act, 1957 and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act, 1958 / by J.D. James. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    26/596
    PAGE - Swainston v. Finn and Metropolitan Board of Works (1883), 52 L.J. Ch. 235; 48.L.T. 634; 31 W-R. 498; I1.Digest (Repl) 146,<256 i sf es 161 Swallow v. London County Council, [1916]-1 K.B. 224; 85 L.J.K.B. 234; 114.L.1. 368; 80. J..P..164; 3 Al ghee 181; L.G.R:. 30%; 225; Cox,, GC. 295; 44 Digest 139,75 .. . at x a oe 275 gh Taylor’s Central Garages (Exeter), Ltd. v. Roper (1951), 115 J.P. 445; [1951] 2-1 284) 2nd Dipest.oupp: is = aE Ry is 68 Thomas v. Sutters, [1900] 1 Ch. ro (C.A. ); 69-L: J Ch.i273 08 Le Aoe eee W.R2 1333.16 T.L.R. 73-44 Sol. Jo...24;. to Com sC.C7 ie ee ee 724; 25 Digest 435, 327 266 Thomas v. Sylvester (1873), L.R. 8 QO. B. 368; 42 sv i: Q. B. 237; 29 Ls “E 290: 21 W.R. 912; 3a Digest 205, 948 : 62 Thorneloe and Clarkson, Ltd. v. Board of Trade, [1950] 2 All yon, 245; 66 . (pt. 1), T-L: Ro 1217-5 2nd, Digest supp. 49, 376 Tottenham Local Board v. Rowell (1876), 1 Ex. D. 514 (C: A. ) er ie, Jes B. 432; 35 4.1. 887; -25-W.Risi35; 220 Digest 52552277 54 Tottenham Local Board v. Williamson (1893), 62..L24);OF8: 322; 69 ces A 51: 57 J.P. 614; 9 T.L.R. 372; 26 Digest 551, 2470 ; 107 Travis v. Minister of Local Government and Planning, [19 51]. 2 “All E. ua 673; 125,].Rs.500; /[LO5h} 2el. LR 2old 160 5: Ol alia: OR 49 L.G. Ry 7255, end Digest Supp. & 349 Trim v. Sturminster Rural. District Council, [1938] Z “AML E, R. 168. (Cr Als [1938] 2 K.B. 508; 107 L.J.K.B. 687; 159 L.T. F108 hy bean sats ih 597; 82:Sol. Jo. 3133.30-L.G.R.-319; sDigest Supp, 305, 421 Tulk v. Moxhay (1848), 2 Ph. 774; 1 H. & Tw. 105; Hetil Ch. 83; 3 BE OS: 621: 4 18, Ut 00 40 Dises,. Bran zbo7 270 Tutin v. Northallerton Rural District Council (1947), gt Sol. Jo. 383 (C. A); 2nd Digest Supp. sag 5 sos fe : 306, 329, 346, 349 ° U Union of Whippingham and East Cowes Beneficies, Re, Dereham v. Church Commissioners of England, [1954] 2 All E.R. 22 oak C.); 1954] A.C. 245; 98 Sol. Jo. 268; 3rd Digest Supp. .« 07; 178264; 377, 454 Uttoxeter Urban District Council v. Clarke, [1952] 1 All E. R. F30Gaeg2 2D JePiv3283 50, biG 51550 5rd. Digest Supp. ger OO, 2245 349 Vv Vauxhall Estates, Ltd. v. Liverpool Corporation, [1932] 1 K.B. 733; Io1 Ll. KB. 9705 2140 15.15 107 405 eke ads seagate LOO; 75 Sol. Se 886; 30 L.G.R. 22; “11 Digest.(RepL) 309, 2550 ».- I51 Ww Walker v. Hobbs & Co. (1889), 23 O.B.D. 458; 59 L.J.Q.B. 93; 61: L.T. 688; 54 J.P. ‘19952 338°W.R: 63; 5 T-L.R. 6403) 31 Digest (Repl )iosi35G7 epee Waller v. Thomas, {1921} 1K. Bs541; 90 L.J.K.B. 656; 125 ore 325; 19 LG: R. 109; 31 Digest (Repl.) 657, 7591. ae me a 305 Waisall Overseers v. London and North Western Rail. Co. (1878), 4 App. Cas. 30 (H.L.)3- 48 LiJ.M-C. 65339) LT) 4535443 [iP ries ee7 We toa Digest 136, 920° :. as Fa - oy PaOs 412 Waterer (John), Sons and Crisp, Ltd. v. Huggins (1931), 47) 14 wOg ee Digest. (Repl.) 618, 7336 i ~ i 45 Watts v. Battersea Borough Council, [1929] 2 2 KB. 63 (C.A.); QS Te) Kae. 273; 140 L.T. 504; 93 J.P. 137; 45 T.L.R. 224; 73 Sol. Jo. 143; 27 L.G.R. 307; Digest Supp. 52, 54, 107 Weatheritt v. Cantlay, [1901] 2 K.B. 285: 70 Th Jute B. 799; 84 Lin 768 ; 65 J.P. 644; 49 W.R. 568; 20 Cox, C.C. 1; 38 Digest 209, 438 . -EtEO2, O04 West Ham Corporation v. Charles Benabo & Sons, [1934] All E.R. Rep. a [1934] (20 KB: 9253: - 103M... Jak Be 452; 5A, ee JP. 207Res0 TEE R£3629'76. 50k, J 0; 208s5¢ 32 LAG. teo2- 7 Digest enh -. 50, 53, 56, 280 Whitcombe v. Pollock (1956), 106 L.J. 554 45 White v. St. Marylebone Borough Council, [1915] 3 KB. 249; 84 ite te K.B. 2142; 113 L.T. 447; 79 J.P. 350; 13 L.G.R. 977; 38 Digest 216, 507 “s| 427439 47,°139, 345, 447 William Bean & Sons, Ltd. v. Flaxton Rural District Council. See Bean (William) & Sons, Ltd. v. Flaxton Rural District Council. William Denby & Sons, Ltd. v. Minister of Health. See Denby (William) & Sons, Ltd. v. Minister of Health.