Sanitary engineering : a practical treatise on the collection, removal and final disposal of sewage, and the design and construction of works of drainage and sewerage, with a special chapter on the disposal of house refuse and sewage sludge, and numerous hydraulic tables, formulae & memoranda, including an extensive series of tables of velocity & discharge of pipes & sewers, especially computed by Ganguillet and Kutter's formula / by E.C.S. Moore.
- Moore, E. C. S. (Edward Crozier Sibbald), 1844-
- Date:
- 1898
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: Sanitary engineering : a practical treatise on the collection, removal and final disposal of sewage, and the design and construction of works of drainage and sewerage, with a special chapter on the disposal of house refuse and sewage sludge, and numerous hydraulic tables, formulae & memoranda, including an extensive series of tables of velocity & discharge of pipes & sewers, especially computed by Ganguillet and Kutter's formula / by E.C.S. Moore. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by The University of Glasgow Library. The original may be consulted at The University of Glasgow Library.
775/802 (page 603)
![it is necessary to find centre of pressure on projecting portion from centre of footings :— 23' 2 —15' Half-width of footings = =2'*1 Length of projection =15-(7'6+ 2' 1) = 5' 5 Pressure at centre of footings )_ 1847 . ^ „ in excess of normal pressure I ~ 15 =*C*y902 cwts. '1847 Total pressure at this point —-^ h -05902 = -15132 Distance of centre of pressure] -1847 of projection from centre oi[= , ^^.-..^—twt^ x 5' 5=35-71 ins. footings ) -15132+-1847 and M=(-1513 x -1847) x 35-71 x 5' 5 6 :4x-336 x35-71 x 65 . ,0 24 x-336 X 35-71 X 65. , ..^-' = (asZ.=l) [r=l-39 for concrete, 1 Portland cement, 2 sand, 6 gravel, vide Table 98, p. 596.] .•. 115-9 inches=9-6 feet. The depth of the foundations in this case is one-tenth the height of the shaft. Cardiff Report on Methods of Disposal of House Refuse.—The following summary of the Cardiff Report is taken from The Surveyor of January 5th, 1897 :— A special committee appointed by Cardiff Corporation has just reported upon visits which it paid to a number of important towns to inspect the methods there adopted for disposing of house refuse. The deputation during its investigations was struck with the fact that in nearly every place it visited the official in charge of the works considered his method and his type of destructor the best and unsur- passable. There were, however, two exceptions to the general rule. The city engineer of Liverpool does not recommend the convey- ance of the refuse to sea in steam hoppers, and the Liverpool Corporation was contemplating erecting more destructors and discon- tinuing the steam hoppers, while at Glasgow the conveyance of the refuse of 750,000 persons into the country by rail daily is found to be no small undertaking, and the advice given there was to burn as much' as possible, so as to reduce the bulk to a minimum. As to type of destructor, the deputation believes, from what it saw, that high temperature furnaces are the best, requiring, ton for ton, no greater manual labour, and requiring fewer furnaces and less space upon which to erect them. One of the great drawbacks which the deputation finds](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b21459526_0775.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)