The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.
- United Kingdom
- Date:
- 1963
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.
11/132
No text description is available for this image
No text description is available for this image
No text description is available for this image![TABLE OF CASES where a digest of the case will be found. Adsett v. K and L. Steelfounders and Engineers, Ltd., [1953] 1 All E.R. 97, n.; [1953] 1 W.L.R. 137; 97 Sol. Jo. 49; 51 L.G.R. 99, affirmed, [1953] 2 All Ex. 320; [1953] 2) Wi LiR. 773; 97 Sol. ih 419; 51, L:G.R, 418, C.A,3 24 Digest (Repl.) 1072, 3r0 Allcroft v. Lord Bishop of London, [1891] A. c 666; [1891-4] All E. vi Rep. 144: Onli /O.B0 625 °65: Le. Togas) fae: 773: 7 T.L.R. 668, H.L.; 16 Digest (Repl.) 349, 1265 Lg 4: 4c ae ie # Arrowsmith v. Jenkins, [1963] ; 2 All E. Re ei ; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 856; ae fo 289; 107 Sol. Jo. 215; 61 L.G.R. 312 .. ui: Atkinson v. London and North Eastern Rail. Co., [1926] I K.B. 313; [1925] All E.R. Rep. 346; 95 L.J.K.B. 266; 134 L.T.217; 90 J.P.17; 42 T.L.R. 79; eas Geter? -28°Cox, C.C. Enz, D.C; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1052, r99 A.-G. of Gambia v. N’Jie, [1961] 2 All E.R. 504; [1961] A.C. 617; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 845; 105 Sol. Jo. 421, P.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. Automatic Woodturning Co., Ltd. v. Stringer, [1957] 1 All E. R. 90; (19571 A.C. 544; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 209; ror) | SolJo. (10647155 iG RR. 77), Hil: 3rd Digest Supp. svt : B.P. Refinery (Kent), Ltd. v. Walker (Valuation Officer), [1957]. I All E.R. 700; [1957] 2 Q.B. 305; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 907; 121 J.P. 231; 101 Sol. Jo. 391; 55 L.G.R. 310; 169 Estates Gazette 264, C.A.; 38 nei (Repl.) 630, 956 . 3 £. ip Barr v. Cruickshank & ore Ltd. (1958), 74 Sh. Ct. Rep. 218 é , ays Bath v British Transport Commission, [1954] 2 All E.R. 542; [1954] t WLR 1013; 98 Sol. Jo. 472; [1954] I oo hey Rep. 463, C.A.; 24 vb de (Repl.) 1063, 257. . oi Beardsley v. Giddings, [1904] 1 KB. 8473 73 a K.B. 378; 90 Lik. “651; 68 P.P222 5+ 53 W.R..78;) 20 T.L.R. 315; 48 °Sol. Jos 352; 20 Cox C.C, 6455 2 L.G.R. 719, D.C.; 14 Digest (Repl.) 160, 7323 Md rh ee wi Beer v Davies, [1958] 2 All E.R. 255; [1958]2 QO.B. 187; 122 J.P. 344; 102 Sol. Jo. 383; 56 L.G.R. 261; 42 Cr. App. Rep. 198, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. ahs sa he bi i ata :« at Black v. Fife Coal Co., “Ltd., [r9t2] AVC) 149; 81. L.9.P.C..97;' 106. L.T. 161; 28°T.L.R. £507°°5 B.W.C.C. 217, H.L.; 34 Digest (Repl.) 290, 2075 Boden v. Moore (1961), 105 Sol. Jo. 510, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. Bottomley v. Harrison, [1952] 1 All E.R. 368; tio} .P?. 213; oc Sol. Jo. 90: 50 L.G.R. 172, D.C.; 36 Digest (Repl.) 338, 799 Braham v. J. Lyons & Co., Ltd., [1962] 3 All E.R. 281; [1962] 1 WLR. 1048; 106 Sol. Jo. 588; 60 L.G.R. 453, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. .. wl a6 Brend v. Wood (1946), 175 L.T. 306; 110 J.P. 317; 62 T.L.R. 462; 90 Sol. jo 381; 44 L.G.R. 254, D.C.; 17 Digest (Repl.) 460, r94 Britannic Merthyr Coal Co., Ltd. v. David, [1910] A.C. 74; 79 oe } K. B. 153; fOteL. 1) 833; 26rL.L. R. ae 54 Sol. Jo. 151, H.L.; 34 Digest (Repl.) 291, 2082 pa bs es ahi a. a Brooks v. Bagshaw, [1904] 2 KR 798; 73 L.J.K.B. 839; 91 L.T. 535; 68 f Pac§¥45°53.W-R. £33) 20 T. ER. .655; 248 Sols Joi 623;' 20 Cox Cic, dal: 2 L.G.R. 1007, D.C.; 14 Digest (Repl.) 169, 7324 .. Burns v. Joseph Terry & Sons, Ltd., [1950] 2 All E.R. 987; 1 ‘K. B. 454; 114 Jee Or3; (1951).1 TLR. 1340 fr 04 Sol Jo» 897; 49 LiG.R. 161, C.A,; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1056, 222 ‘ Butler v. Glacier Metal Co. (1924), D. Cc: unreported Buxton v. Minister of Housing and Local Government, [1960] 3 “All E. R. 408: [1961] 1 Q.B. 278; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 866; 124 J.P. 489; 104 Sol. Jo. 935; 59 L.G.R. 45; 3rd Digest Supp. “7 ha a .s ae ey Byrne v. Statist Co., [1914] 1 K.B. 622; 83 L.J.K.B. aes rid Let, ‘pod 30 T.L.R. 254; 58 Sol. Jo. 340; 13 Digest (Repl.) 55, 5 Callaghan v. Fred. Kidd & Son (Engineers), Ltd., [1944] 1 Eat E. R. 525; [1944] 1. B.nghertr rai: J. KB: 382 ; 270 .L:T. 368; 60 T.L.R. 469% 88 Sol. Jo. 239; 42 L.G.R. 250, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1064, 265 Cardiff Rating Authority and Cardiff Assessment Committee v. Guest Keen Baldwin’s Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., [1949] 1 All E.R. 27; [1949] 1 K.B. 385; [1949] L.J.R. 713; 113 J.P. 78; 65 T.L.R. 159; 93 Sol, ate ak vii 16 t6 82 27 44 aye 95 22 24 31 89 38 96 24 81 31 27 27 44 96 16](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b3217021x_0011.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)