The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.

  • United Kingdom
Date:
1963
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    12/132
    Carr v. Mercantile Produce Co., Ltd., [1949] 2 All E.R. 531; [1949] 2 K.B. 601; [1949] L.J.R. 1597; 113 J.P. 488; 65 T.L.R. 503; 93 Sol. Jo. Soak 47 L.G.R. 642, D.C.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1052, 205 Carroll v. North British Locomotive Co., Ltd., 1957 S.L. T. (Sh. Ct. as Caswell v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries, Ltd., [1939] 3 All E.R. 722: [1940]. A.C. 152; 108 L.J.K.B. 779; 161 L.T. 374; 55 T.L.R. 1004; 83 Sol. Jo. 976, H.L.; Digest Supp. vil ls hs oa ma it Charles v. S. Smith & Sons (England), Ltd., [1954] 1 All E.R. 499; [1954] TO Wolskha ASLs Sol. Jo. ay. 52 L.G.R. las 24 Digest (Repl.) 1054 BI as Cherry v. International ‘Alloys, Ltd., [1960]. 3 All E. R. 264: [1961] I Q. B. 136; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 568; 104 Sol. Ao; 7625 HG Leis tks 3°7, C.A.; ay Digest Supp. Chipchase v. British Titan Products! Con Ltd., [1956] I “All E. R. 613; [1956] 1 QO.B. 545; [1956] 2 W.L.R. 677; 100 Sol. Jo. 186; 54 ..L.G, hoes, tA: 34 Digest (Repl.) 246, 1792 : City of Plymouth (City Centre) Declaratory Order, 1946, Re Robinson v. Minister of Town and Country Planning, [1947] 1 All E.R. 851; [1947] K.B. 9702; [1947] 'L.] Ri. 12855 1797) de aya BS 21 87059 eee g1 Sol. Jo. 294; 45 L.G.R. 497, C.A.; 2nd Digest Supp. .. Clarkson v. Modern Foundries, Ltd., [1958] 1 All E.R. 33; [1957] I “W.LR. I210; 101 Sol. Jo. 960, 3rd Digest Supp. Clokey v. ‘London and North Western Rail. Co., [1905] 2 I. R. 2 51: 39 bie 42: 38 Digest (Repl.) 285, *35 - 3% Close v. Steel Company of Wales, Ltd., [1961] 2 All E.R. 953: [1962] A.C. 367; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 319; 105 Sol. Jo. 586; 59 L.G.R. 439, H.L.; 3rd Digest Supp. ++ a + ie = ; Corcoran v. East Surrey, Ironworks Co. tiie 55 1L:J.Q0.B; 745; 5,23. 3939 DC.; 34 Digest (Repl.) 303, 2r9r Corn v. Weir’s Glass (Hanley), Ltd., [1960] 2 “ANE.R. 300; [1960] 1 W. re R. 577: 104 Sol. Jo. 447, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. Cox v. Cutler & Sons, Ltd. v. Hampton Court Gas oo [1948] 2 “All E, R. 665; [1949] L.J.R. 294; 92 Sol. ei: 586; 46 L.G.R. 517, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1OZ2i/2R |, tes Customs and Excise Comrs. v. “Cure ‘and Deeley, Ltd., [1961] 3 “All E. R. 641; [1962] 1 Q.B. 340; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 798; 105 Sol. Jo. 708; 3rd Digest Supp. ene ad ‘ oh Ke . Davis v. Lisle, [1936] 2 ‘All E. R. 213: [1936] 2 K.B. 434; 105 L.J.K.B. 593; 155 L.T. 23; 100 J.P. 280; 52 T.L.R. 475; 80 Sol. Jo. 409; 34 L.G.R. 253; 30 Cox C.C. 412, D.C.; 15 Digest (Repl.) 852, 82or .. Derry v. Peek (1889), 14 App. Cas. 337; 58 L.J.Ch. 864; 61 ithe 265; 54 i P. 148; 381 W. Re 1935795, AAR 625342 ais in $02,431.62 09 AEP SRR (Repl.) 127, 685 ix - % Dilworth v. Comrs. of Stamps, [1899] A. C. 99: 68 9 Med . “47 W.R.. 9375 ~79 L.T. 473; 15 T.L.R. 61, P.C.; 8 Digest (Repl.) 310, *16 14 ‘ Dobson v Colvilles, 1958 S.L.T. (notes) RO? 6 aft 7: a Bt Drabble (Harold), Ltd. v. Hycolite Manufacturing ‘Co. Lk iee 44 hohe. Pes me 72 Sol. Jo. 102; 13 Digest (Repl.) 83, 26z .% ‘ Drummond v. Harland Engineering Co., Ltd., 1963 S.L. T. 11 SF sk Ealing Borough Council v. Jones, [1959] r All E.R. 286; [1959] I O.B. 384: [1959] 2: W-L.R, 194; (723 )JeP.248> 103.S0l., Jo.01315, S7,42G-ResGP ao P. & C. 100, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. “t .é bs 2 Eaton v. Cobb, [1950] 1 ALE.R. TOLO> TCAs. 27%; 48 L.G.R. 528; 26 Digest (Repl.) 469, T5804. Ke a we as Eaves v. Morris Motors, Ltd., [1961] 3 “All E. R. 233: [1961] 2 O.B. 385; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 657; 105 Sol. Jo. 610; 59 L.G.R. 466, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. .. Ebbs v. James Whitson & Co., Ltd., [1952] 2 All E.R. 192; [1952] 2 Q.B. 877; [1952]'1 T.L.Ri i428; 96 Sol. Mis 3753) 50 4L.G. RB. 563, CA.) 24. Digest (Repl.) 1068, 292 .. 4% 44 Ecclesiastical Comrs. for England’s. Conveyance, [1936] Ch. 430; [1934] All ee Rep, 7185 105 aL41.Gha063: 155 L.T. 281; 40 Digest (Repl.) 338; 2762 Edwards v. National Coal Board, [1949] I “All E. R. 743; [1949] I K.B. 704: 65 T.L.R. 430; 93 Sol. Jo. 337, C.A.; 2nd Digest Supp. ' Ellis v. Smith, [1962] 3 All E.R. 954; [1962] 1 W.L.R. 1486; 127 J. P. 51; 106 Sol. Jo. 1069; 61 L.G.R. 64, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. +: Eno v, Dunn (1890), 15 App. Cas. 252; 63 L.T. 6; 39 W.R. 161; Seer edt 379; 7 R.P.C. 311, H.L.; 43 Digest 160, 180 Evans & Co., Ltd. », London County Council, [1914] 3 K.B. 315; [1914-15] AILE-R. Rep, 663; 83 L.J:K.B. 1264; 111 L.2i 2883 785 ).P.! 345he RO Tak. 5°93 A Cox €.C, ini 12 L.G.Re rogos .t8 Digest (Repl.) 266, g2r .. ie ‘6 ¥% it 7 ime #4 PAGE 27 13 38 27 16 12 89 fa 25 34 73 82 Io 26 96 24 44, 83 82 26,27 13 38 16 31 81 34