The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.

United Kingdom

Date:: 1963

Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.

13/132

$Fenton v. Thorley & Co., Ltd., [1903] A.C. 443; 72 L.J.K.B. 787; 89 L.T. 314; 52 W.R. 81; 19 T.L.R. 684; 5 W.C.C. 1; H.L.; 34 Digest (Repl.) 359, 2727 .. Fisher v. Barrett and Pomeroy (Bakers), Ltd., [1954] 1 All E.R. 249; [1954] TO Wills, F551; eres J; Pi245 98) Sol’, Jo.- 4123 - LAG. R93 2:D.G.9 25 Digest (Repl.) 133, 570... Fisher v. Port of London Authority, [1962] I “All E. R. 458; [1962] 1 W. Th R. 234; 105 Sol. Jo. 1126; [1961] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 460; 3rd Digest Supp. .. Follick, Re, Ex parte Trustee (1907), 97 L.T. 645; 52 Sol. Jo. 13; 4 Digest (Repl.) 550, 4817 .. Franklin v. Gramophone Co., Ltd., [1948] I : All E. R. 353; [1948] , K.B. 542: [1948] L.J.R. 870; 64 LURS 186; 92 Sol..Jo. 124, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1020, I inf ~ i a on fi $3 She 4 Frawley (M. & F.), Ltd. v. Ve-Ri-Best Manufacturing Co., Ltd., [1953] 1 All E.R. 50; (1953) 1 Q:B. 318; [1953] 1 W.L.R. 165; 215 L.T.:20;' 97 Sol: Jo. 46; 46R. & L.T. 75; 3 P. & C.R. 301; 160 Estates Gazette 582, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. > o Fe *, @ a -. se ae wi Galashiels Gas Co., Ltd. v. O’Donnell or Millar, [1949] 1 All E.R. 319; [1949] A.C. 275; [19490] L.J.R. 540; 113°J.P.144;'65 T.L.R. 76; 93 Sol. Jo. 71; 47 L.Gikv219) Hil. 24 Digest:(Repl.) 1061, 247 f. ot Gallagher v. Dorman, Long & Co., Ltd., [1947] 2 All E. be 38; 277 had 143, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1062, 252 Garton v. Great Western Rail. Co. (1858), E.B. & E. 837 . Ginty v. Belmont Building Supplies, Ltd., [1959] 1 All E. Me 414: 3rd Digest Supp. 0, Gohoho v. Guinea Press, ‘Ltd., [1962] 3 All E. R. 785; [1963] I Q. B. 948; [1962] 4 °W.L.Rii47t 3) 106'Sol. Jou. 1029, ‘CsA.;, 3rd Digest Supp. \). Golder v. Thomas Johnston’s (Bakers) Ltd., 1950 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 50... Goldsmiths’ Co. v. West Metropolitan Rail. core) [1904] I K.B. 1; [1900-3) All Pate rens.007s ye LAB? 9393 869) LV 428 7°68! | Pars 52WLR Sar: 20 T.L.R. 7; 48 Sol. Jo. 13, C.A.; 11 Digest (Repl.) 184, 509 Gould & Co. v. Houghton, [1921] 1 K.B. 509; [1920] All E.R. Rep. 679: 90 Lepricesoigog. 8 1240 10.1 566;/ 85.) P293437 TLICR) 201; 6 Solsfo: 3443 26 Cox C.C, 693; 19 L.G.R. 85, D.C.; 14 Digest (Repl.) 82, 454, .. Graigola Merthyr Co., Ltd. v. Swansea Corpn., [1929] A.C. 344; 98 L.J.Ch. 233; $4a0-bs..25055) 93.) .P. 12127. L.GR24393°93 Soli Jo. 10938.45°T. LR aig; H.L.; 20 Digest (Repl.) 578, 28II a “a ie 2 a wi Greenberg v. Cooperstein, [1926] Ch. 657; 95 L.J.Ch. 466; 135 L.T. 663; 9 Digest (Repl.) 73, 289 ss a 52 # LZ Greenwood v. Greenwood, [1907] 97 1 ai 771; 24.1... ji24%-D.C.3) 34) Digest (Repl.) 301, 2178 ai De ar ly at Griffith v. Ferrier, 1952 S.C. J.) 50; (19521 Sa ae PAD 24 Digest (Repl.) 1030, eG. A ss ne od Grove v. Eastern ‘Gas Board, ‘[r95r] 2 All E.R. 1051; br952) Gr K, Bos75 116 Theths, 1O51) 2 Le Rori2s © 95 ‘Sol. -Jo.'7s9;56° E.G. R.. 146) CASS 25 Digest (Repl.) 530, 79 . on me - = ‘ Groves v. Lord Wimborne, [1898] 2 ‘0. B: 402; [1898] All E.R. Rep. 147; 67 Eyl bs 002 5779 EPi2s47 47 WR 87; , r4a°r CR. 403; | 42’ Sol.*Jo.. 633: C.A.3°24 Digest (Repl.) 1045, 169 1 he A 4 Hall v. Fairfield Shipbuilding & Engineering Co., 1962 wiagas 1o62* S713 260° 0% He AF Ai Bi ata nF . Hammett (R. C.), Ltd. v. Crabb (1931), 145 a 638; [1931] All E.R. Rep. 70; OS fer. +2607 4771.0. Re.6237)-20 Ty.GiRs.§1§ 54 29) Cox: CC) 3641 D.Co}: 25 Digest (Repl.) 150,623 .. oe x Hammett (R. C.), Ltd. v. London County Council (1933), 97 ‘VP 105; 49 sly. R209; 3rL.GiRL 155) DC: 3025) Digest| (Repl. )tr51,, 624 , Hare v. Gocker, [1962] 2 All E.R. 763; [1962] 2 O.B. 641; [1962] 3 W.L. R. 330: £26./| 37.3953) 106,S0l.A)o. 53%j0.00'L.G. R4a78; D:Cin 3rd. Digest Supp. i. Hargrove & Co., Ex parte (1875), 10 Ch. App. 542; 44 La ehh 560;-« 321 G0, 713; 23 W.R. 939; 2 Asp M.L.C.N.S. 570; 9 Digest (Repl.) 71, 28r 5 Harold Drabble, Ltd. v. Hycolite Manufacturing Co. See Drabble (Harold), Ltd. v. Hycolite Manufacturing Co. Harris v. Rugby Portland Cement Co., Ltd., [1955] 2 All E.R. 500; [1955] I W.L.R. 648; 99 Sol. Jo. 384; 53 L.G.R. 402, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1063, 261 y ve we Sd Harrison v. Metropolitan Vickers Electrical Con Ltd., [1954] 1 All E.R. 404; [1954] T° W.L.R: 324; 98 Sol. Jo, 108; 52 GER 174, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1063, 256 .. ft 9 a Xs : Hector Whaling, Ltd., Re, [1936] Ch. 208; [1935] All E.R. Rep. 302; 105 Liji Cie aa tee Les 423 © 52 Te I42j*7O%Sol. .fo: 288) 9 Digest (Repl.) 618, grr4 .. $3 4 Hendon Corpn. v. Stanger, [1948] rt All E.R. 377; 112 lip 190, sub nom. Stanger v. Hendon Borough Council, [1948] 1 K.B. 571; [1948] L.J.R. 1008; 64 T.L.R. 164; 92 Sol. Jo. 153; 46 L.G.R. 129, C.A.; 2nd Digest Supp. 38, 66 80 Io 89 Io 28 80 89 39 OI Io 31 31 76 Io 33 74 25 8I 14 Io 25 25 64$

The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.

Licence and re-use

Contents