The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.
- United Kingdom
- Date:
- 1963
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.
14/132
![PAGE Hobday v. Nicol, [1944] 1 All E.R. 307; ue L.J.K.B. 264; 42 °L.G.R. ‘103, D.C.; 2nd Digest Supp. ce ik iS is sy 95 Hodkinson v. Henry Wallwork & Col, Ltd., [1955] 3 All E.R. 236; [1955] 1 W.L.R. 1195; 99 Sol. Jo. 778; ‘53 L.G.R. 656, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 509%, CPA er aim we i 2 27 Holland v. Northwich Highway Board (1876), 34 Lilo t370. BO deh. 5175 138 Digest (Repl.) 124, 848 .. a abs ne be + 76 Horner v. Franklin, [1905] 1 K.B. 479; 74 L. J]. KaBY 297002 wail. 578: '69 J.P) 1173) ier I.L.R, 225;+3,L.G.R, (423, CoA. aa Digeetemeeph) s 100s, 200%..% re ia ci ye a a 84 four Uv. Goodall, [1962] I All Ei. R. 30; [1962] 2 Q.B. 401; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 157; 126 J.P. 52; 105 Sol. Jo. 1085, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. rs Sy 89 Hosking v. De Havilland Aircraft Co., Ltd. - [x949] t All E.R. mae 83 LI.L.Rep. 11; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1064, 264 24 Iles v. Abercarn Welsh Flannel Co. sc il 2 T.LR. 547, D. C.; 24 Digest (Repl ) LOaQ S724) ; 33 Jayne v. National Coal Board, [1963] 2 All E. R. 220 ‘ 16 Jennings v. Kelly, [1939] 4 All E.R. 464; [1940] A.C. 206; 109 oy het 38: 162. .L.T. 1; 56. T.L.R.'1545. 64) S014 One4 48 yi 30 Lieean hentia 367, 46 4 i ae ie ‘_ pie st Pa ati Wie 83 John Summers & Sons, Ltd. v. Frost. See Summers (John) & Sons, Ltd. v. Frost. Jolliffe v. Wallasey Local Board (1873), L.R. 9 C.P. 62; 43 L.J.C.P. 41; 29 L.T. 582; 38 J.P. 40; 2 Asp. M.L.C. 146; 38 Digest (Repl.) 124, 847 76 Kahn v. Newberry, [1959] 2 All E.R. 202; [1959] 2 Q.B.1; 123 J.P. 307; [1959] 2 W.L.R. 650; 103 Sol. Jo. 352; 57 LGR. 140, D.C.: 3rd Digest Supp. .. 10 Kimpton v. Steel Company of Wales, [1960] 2 All E.R. 274; [1960] 1 W.L.R. 527; 104 Sol. Jo. 387, C.A.; 34 Digest (Repl.) 245, 1789 =i. . 25 Kirkheaton District Local Board v. Ainely, Sons & Co., [1892] 2 Q. B. 274; 62.0. J.0.8. 812; 67: Le oor Aguile ao: 4 W.R. 997308 I day 669; 36 Sol. Jo. 608, a A.; 13 Digest (Repl.) 467, 973 5 - sh 31 Knight v. Leamington Spa Courier, Ltd., [1961] 2 All E.R. 666; “ [1961] 210uB: 253; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 79; 105 Sol. Jo. 405 59 L.G.R. 374, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. of % ‘we <A 28 Lamb v. Sunderland and District Creamery, b Bs ap [1951] 1 All E.R. 923; 115 J.P. 300; 95 Sol. Jo. 319; 49 L.G.R. 705, D.C.; 25 Digest (Repl.) 83, rzz .. 80 Lamb v. Wright & Co., [1924] I K.B. 857; [1924] AILE.R. Rep. 220; 93 L.J.K.B. 366; 130 L.T. 703; 40.T.L.R, 2900; 68 Sol. 1: 479; [1924] B. & C.R. 97; 5 Digest (Repl.) 844, 7105 7 ia eh ns 80 Latimer v. A.E.C., Ltd., [1953] 2 All E.R. 449; [1953] A.C. 643}, $1953103 W.L.R, 2593/1157 LP. 38-75007 BOLO, ssid BY) L:G.R.i457, dads if a4 Digest (Repl.) 1065, 267 .. 24 Layton v. Shires, [1959] 3 All E.R. 587; [1960] 2 Q. Vet 294; [1959] 3 W.L.R. 949; 124 J.P. 46; 103 Sol. Jo. 856; 57 L.G.R. 365; 44 Cr. App. Rep. 18; 3rd Digest Supp. .. 89 Lester v. Balfour Williamson Merchant Shippers, Ltd., [1953] I “All AD. R. 1146: [79§3]2,0.B.1685 117 J.P 3085 971Sol. 19: 3533 51: UG.R.. 357, DG. 3rd Digest Supp. ‘% 2 80 fe v. George W. Horner & Co., Ltd., [1950] r All E. R. 234; “114 ae ry 6 {pt..1) T.L.R.296; so4/Sol; Jo. tag: AB Ga gay DU 25 Leen (Repl) PEL, 949i ties * - te “> ee 80 Lister v. Perryman (1870), L.R. 4 H.L. 521; 39 L.J.Ex. eg 23 LT. 269; 35 J-P. 4; 19 W.R.9 H.L.; 33 Digest (Repl.) 428, 456 oa 73 London and Globe Finance Corpn., Ltd., Re, [1903] 1 Ch. 728; [1900-3] All E.R. Rep. 891; 72) L,J.Ch, 368; 88 L.T, 1945. 51 W.R. .651).30 TIGR. 414} 10 Mans. 198; to Digest (Repl.) 1042, 7278 .. as 4,3 “a < 81 Lovelace v. Public Prosecutions Director, [1954] 3 All E.R. 481; [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1468; 119 J.P. 21; 98 Sol. Jo. 852, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp... 31 M’Cafferty v. Brown, 1950 S.C. 300; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1048, *gr as ty 29 McCarthy v. Coldair, Ltd., [1951] 2 T.L.R. 1226; 95 Sol. Jo. aM 50 L.G.R. 85, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1065,/272) \ ws sak Ay 16 McCarthy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers, Ltd., [1940] ; E “All E. R. Bor - 133.)-b; 229; 65 ‘I.L.R. 50%; 93 Sol. Jo. 237; 47 L.G.R. 588, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1069, 298 .. 4 12, 21; 28 McGlennon’s Application for Registration of Shariracle Re Troon, 25 T. = Re 234 53 Sol. Jo. 14; 25 R.P.C. 797; 43 Digest (Repl.) 158, 160 .. 81 McLeod (or Houston) v. Buchanan, [1940] 2 All E.R. 179; 84 Sol. i 492, Ei: Ls; 29 Digest (Repl.) 538, 3693 ; 31 McMath v. Rimmer Bros. (Liverpool), Ltd., [r96t) 3 All ths R. II gai [1962] 1 W.L.R. 1; 106 Sol. Jo. 110; 60 L.G.R. 116, C. ae 3rd Digest Supp. .. 38 Marshall v. Gotham Co., Ltd., [1954] t All E.R. 937; [1954] A.C. an [1954] 2 W.L.R. 812; 98 Sol. Jo. 268, H.L.; 33 Digest (Repl.) 909, 1367 . ve 16](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b3217021x_0014.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
