The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.
- United Kingdom
- Date:
- 1963
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.
16/132
![PAGE R. v. Carr-Briant, [1943] 2 AI E.R. 156; [1943] K.B. 607; 112 L.J.K.B. 581; 169 L,Ty175;107,J:F..167; .590.1.L.R. 300;,410.G hy aos? eo a en. 76, C.C.A.; 14 Digest (Repl.) 495, 4791 a a ks # be 80 R. v. Chapman and Alderman (1843), 7 J.P. 132; 15 Digest (Repl.) eh II,422 10 R. v. Chertsey Justices, Ex parte Frank, [1961] I All E. R. 825; [1961] 4 Q. i, 152; fr9o1]'2 W.L.R. 442; 125 J.P. 305; 105 SOL, JO. 101} SOu ce me, coo, 1).U., 3rd Digest Supp. +e i sa ‘+ p ee a zs 79 R. v. Christian (1913), 78 J.P. 112; 23 Cox C.C. 541; 15 Digest (Repl.) 1021, 10,035 o Ne Be a un fs 4x 4 =e 31 R. v. dieses (1918), 82 J.P. 295; .26 Cox CC. 138; 30 Digest (Ken); 303,976 ... 81 R. v. Comptroller-General of Patents, Ex parte Bayer Products, Ltd., [1941] 2 AllLER. 6775 [1941] 2 KB. 306;. Et) Be Os el ee eo R.P.C; 251, C.4. 3°17 Digest (Repl) 4gereeoa.. sa a Re — 31 K. v. Dunbar, [1957] 3, All E.R. 7373) [1905a)t OB r, [i057) 3 .vy ety ga: T27 J.P, 500% 1Or Sols J0.4047 is Cr. App. mP 182, C.C.A.3 3rd Digest Supp. 80 ay Wy Greenberg, [1942] 2 2 All E, R. 344; 59 ‘per R. 213; 28 Us App. Rep. 160, C.C.A.; 17 Digest (Repl.) 474, 257 8I R. v. Grunwald, [1960] 3 All E.R. 380; [1961] 2 “W.L.R. 606; 124 ie Pp. 495; 705501; Jo. 368, C.C.A. 3rd’ Digest Sappeaeea 82 R. v. Herefordshire Justices (1820), 3 B. & Ald. 581; 42 Digest 949, 224 . 34 R. v. Lord Kylsant, [1932] 1 K.B. 442; [1931] 1 AllE.R. Rep. 179; tor L.J.K. B. 973. 146, LiT. 215.48. T.L.R.625098 Sol sjorua 5, 20 LON Nak 470, ooo coe. App. Rep. 83; 15 Digest (Repl.) 1115, 11,075 8 ma o- oe 81 R. v. Laitwood (1910), 4 Cr. ARE ean 248, CCAS 14 Digest (Repl) tr, i pide 3 a Ky e3 ne see 73 R. v, Leicester Union, [1899] ew B. 632: 68 Fold. O45 meee oo. d 5593 15 TLR 5113. 43 Sal. Jo. 601, D.C.2 16 Digest (Repl.) LP URES 4 ~ 70 R. v. London Quarter Sessions, Ew parte Rossi, [1956] 1 All E.R. 670: [1956] 1,/0.B.-6625 [1950] 2 WL. kt ORs eager. aes OO nas: 4 225, C.A.; 16 Digest (Repl. ) 473, 2929 te A bs 89 R. v. London Quarter Sessions, Ex parte “Westminster Corpn., [1951] 1 All E.R, 1032; [1951] 2. K2B,: 5083 tansy la ease roar rar ieee 932; 49 L.G.R. 643, D.C.; 26 Digest (Repl.) 483, 7695 83 R. v. Mackenzie and Higginson (1910), 75 J.P. 159; 6 Cr. App. Rep. 64, Nets AL: 14 Digest (Repl.) 127, 887 31 R. v. Mackinnon, [1958] 3 All E.R. 657: [1959] I ‘OB. 150; 123 igs 433 102 Sol. Jo. 861; 43 Cr. App. Rep. 1; 3rd Digest Supp. . <t 82 R. v. Miskell, [1954] 1, All E:R137; [1954] rt W.L.R. 438; 118 - P. 113; 98 Sol. Jo. 148; 37 Cr. App. Rep. 214; 14 Digest (Repl.) 116, 804 . 73 R. v. Nottingham Quarter Sessions, Ex parte Harlow, [1952] 2 All E. R. 78: [1952] 2,.Q0.B. 601; «116 J.P. 3907; [to52], 1 TkL.R.(2546;06 Sol.Jo, vis; 50 L.G.R. 447, DG 38 Digest (Repl.) 212, 334 a bas ade a 44 R. v. Percy Dalton (London), Ltd., [1949] L.J.R. 1626; 65 T.L.R. 326; 93 Sol.’ Jo. 358; »33.Cr. App. Rep. 102, C.C.A.; 17 Digest (Repl) i472,.252) “3, 73 R. v. Perfect, [1957] 2 All E.R. 250; [1957] 1 Q.B. 107; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 904; F246) 724/353, 010L/5OL, an 3904; 41 Cr. App, Repareo, CCA; 3rd MEE Supp. 42 . v. Russell, [1953] 1 W.L.R. 77; 97 ‘Sol. Jo. La, C.C.A.: 3rd Digest Supp. ae 82 v. Scoffin, [1930] 1 K.B. 741; 99 L.J.K.B. 521; 143 L.T. T2i 5 401) ise ae 7a Sol, Jo2210; -2g.C px 'C.C, tha; “oer Ann, dner cs, Or A 14 Digest (Repl.) 591, 5870 ye he f = a 7 « f af: 28 R. v. Senior, [1899] 1 O.B. 283: [1895-9] All E.R. Rep. 511; 68 L.J.Q.B. 175; 79° LT, 56279639). PS 8S 47° W.. °3673 1s ‘Tel Ro aioe:s 2s Sor jo ate. 20 Cox C.C. 219; 14 Digest (Repl.) 55, 198 : ‘ ri a: 82 R. v. Somerset Justices, Ex parte Ernest J. Cole & Partners Td [1950] I AIDE. Ry.2643> (9950) 1, KiB 5ro3. 114 | Pivaea sO iota) 2, lee 275; 94 Sol. Jo. 163; 48 L.G.R. 232, D.C.; 33 Digest (Repl.) 368, 78r4 . 83 R. v. South Shields Licensing Justices, [1911] 2 K.B.I.; 80 L.J.K.B. 809: Sub nom. R. v. South Shields Justices, Ex parte Morrison, LOS LT Piarsess Te 299; 27 T.L.Ri i930) 55'Sol:..Jo. 386; e2nCoxC Ceara 3° Digest (Repl.) 91, 688 : 42 R. v. Surrey Quarter Sessions, “Bk parte Lilley, [1951] 2 “All E. R. 659: [r9st] 2 8B. 749) TIS jf. P5073) (r65x102 ela 546; 95 Sol. Jo. 697, D.C.; 38 Digest (Repl.) 190, 779 ote ie an it 83 R. v. Turner [1910] 1 K.B. 346; 79 Ts yeas B. 176; 162 T4675) 74 Pere 26 T.L.R: 112; 54 Sol. Jo..164; 22 Cox C.C, 310; *9\CreAppoRep.ae3) GC.A.; 22 Digest (Repk)izao; 967 185 ~ wit és ie bi 64 R. v. Walker (1934), 24 Cr. App. Rep. 117, C.C.A.; 14 Digest (Repl.) 242, 2085 .. 82 Ramsay v. Mackie (1904), 7 F. (Ct. of Sess.) 106; 42 S.L.R. 114; 12 S.L.T. 468; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1033, *32 oe a Se 4 a 2 af 34 ie](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b3217021x_0016.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
