The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.

  • United Kingdom
Date:
1963
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    17/132
    / Rawlence v. Croydon Corpn., [1952] 2 All E.R. 535; [1952] 2 Q.B. 803; 116 L-Pingrs5 y t1952)2 ‘TL. Re 460596 ‘Sol. Jo. 5308 50! LGR; $576, C.Ax: 26 Digest (Repl.) 684, 18 aye er me Reed, Re, Bowen & Co., Ex parte Official Receiver (1887), pio ahold fal BP ge iy beam 64 L.J.0.B. 447; 56 tere: 370% 35 WR. 6607, ae 1.0.1 16403...4'Morr.:225) C.A.; 4 Digest (Repl.) 201, 1806 : Reid v. Westfield Paper Co., Ltd., 1957 S.C. “218; 3rd Digest Supp. : : Richard Thomas and Baldwins, Ltd. v. Cummings. See Thomas (Richard) and Baldwins, Ltd. v. Cummings. Rippon v. Port of London Authority and Russell & Co., [1940] 1 All E.R: 637; O40) 1.555 2100. L.] KB. 360%. 26240, 1/325) 104.) 186? 561.1. R: a15; 04 Sol’ fo. 273; 38 L.G.Ry 188; 31 Cox CC. 366; 2h Digest (Repl.) 1088, 399 os “it a Ay Robinson v. Sunderland ‘Corpn., [1899] I Q. B. 751: 6844 0 Bi3g0; Sou..T; 262; 063. |°P. 341; 15 T.L.Ri 195; 19:Cox,C.C.245, D.C.; 38. Digest (Repl.) 163, 44 any Fi Me 4 oe =e a ae Rogers v. Barlow & Son (1906); 94° L712 51907 70 Ick; anak iG; 74 Digest (Repl.) 1095, 437 .. “er Rollo v. Minister of Town and Country Planning, [1948] r All E.R. 3; [1948] Deel tek? o btes [ePst0n ss 04. 1 LR 2550 62 Sols |OnaOUrdG LR, 714. C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. 5 se oh ba 4 a Bee Ut elty (rots) 4 eer 402s O2 Lee BI 322 107 ol, sao. 79 [Pts DP LG R./36;°23 CoxiC.C.'243) D.C:; 25 Digest (Repl.) 116, 977°. Ross-Clunis v. Papadopoullos, [1958] 2 ‘All E.R. esp litggs} nr Wik 546: a2 J.P /.3402) (102 Sol: Jo: 362, P.C.;- 3nd Digest'Supp. Royal Victoria Pavilion Ramsgate, Re, Whelan v. F.T.S. (Great Britain), Ltd., [1961] 3 All E.R. 83; [1961] Ch. 581; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 491; 105 Sol. Ake 684; 3rd Digest Supp. . Royal Worcester Corset Co.’s Application, Re, [1909] I Ch. 459; 78 LAD. Ch. 309; Toms bees. 25 LL neat S43 digest T85 948 os) Sawyer and Whithall, Re, [1919] 2 Ch. 333; 88 L.J.Ch. 474; 122 ee 158: S51 ERY ér1: °63 Sol. Jo. 662; 42 Digest 247, 2788 . : Sevenoaks Urban District Council v. Twynam, [1929] 2 K. hey Vi 98 Ti Aoi B. 537; 141 L.T. 566;° 93 J.P. 189; 45 T.L.R. 508; 73 Sol. Jo. 334; 27 DAe B25, D.C.; Digest Sapp. as ba i oe aE ais Shave v. Rosner, [1954] 2 All E.R. 280; [1954] 2 QO.B. 113; [1954] 2 W.L.R. $0597 (110 J.F. 304.) 00 SOL, 1°; COIL ye VES SOME band 8] Ot ae ial at Supp. Shurey, Re Sy v. Shurey. [1918] I hese 263; 87 ir 19 Ch. 245: 12 LT. 3953 4015: 2713-62, Soko lo. 246;, 26 Digest (Repl:) 494) /12 ... Sidebotham, Re, Ex parte Sidebotham (1880), 14 Ch.D. 458; 49 L.J. Bey. 40 42 L.T. 783; 28 W.R. 715, C.A.; 4 Digest (Repl.) 250, 2267 Simmons v. Heath Laundry Co., [1910] 1 K.B. 543; 79 L.J.K.B. aos: 102 deed Pt V2 ol tk, 4e0 54 SOL, 0. aoe 3 B.W.C. 200,.C.A.;. 34 Digest (Repl.) 18, I5 se 7% ae $s Smith v. Cammell Laird & Can Litas riaaar 4 Al E. ree 4 [1940] A.C. 242; 109 L.J.K.B. 134; 163 TE, Opes, PRs np gG: 1 Te. Re 164 9:84 Sol: Jo. ek 38 L.G.R. 1, H.L.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1087, 396 , Smith v. Morris Motors, -Ltd., [1949] 2 All E.R. 715; Fio%6) I a B. ive Ey eds 521s OS 71 oO LARIG4a= 93° Sol.* [oP6q4; arL.GiR: 722; Dic. jva¢ ne ah (Repl.)*1e52)20r 2: 2% FY ys a6 Solomons v. R. Gertzenstein, THA) [1954] 2 All E.R. 625; gaat 2 Q. B. 2433 98 Sol. Jo. 539; 52 L.G.R. 433, C.A.; 38 Digest (Repl.) 255, 638 Sparrow v. Fairey Aviation Co., Ltd., [1962] 3 All E.R. 706; ies a WeLARVr210; 106 Sol. Jo. 875, H.L.; ard Digest Supp. Stanger v. Hendon Borough Council. See Hendon Conmat v. Stanger. Staincross Revenue Officer v. Staincross Assessment Committee and Whitehead (1930), 143 L.T. 525; 94 J.P. 161; 46T.L.R.516; 28L.G.R. 414; (7926-31), 2 B.R.A. 698, D.C.; 38 Digest (Repl.) B21) 277 Stevenson (Stephenson) Jordan and Harrison, Ltd. v. Macdonald and Evans [Tope htelst ie tors 6Gq.K. Piero. C.As 28.ligest (Repl) 856,873 Stewart v. Chapman, [1951] 2 All E.R. 613; [1951] 2 K.B. 792; 115 J.P. 473; [1951] 2 T.L.R. 640; 95 Sol. Jo. git 35 Cr. ine a Tor; ‘aaa 816, D.C.; 2nd Digest Supp. Stone v. Boreham, [1958] 2 All E.R. ars [1959] I Q. et) 122 z be 418; 102 Sol. Jo. 548, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. Stuckey v. Hooke, [1906] oD oS OT a heey 2m oe = 504; 94 (a 1s 7233 70 i A ok 303; 54 W.R. 509; 22 T.L.R! 508; 50 Sol. Jo. 403) bias 815, C.A.; 24 Summers (John) & Sons, Ltd. v. Frost: 1955] I AlL E. re 870: [1955] A.C. 740; PAGE 96 44 a4 31 81 51 83 LOnAE ei 81 96 44 Sr 95 34 96 27 IO 96 Sr Io