The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138.

  • United Kingdom
Date:
1963
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: The Offices, shops and railway premises Act, 1963 / With introduction and annotations by Ian Fife and E. Anthony Machin. Being a reprint of Butterworths Annotated Legislative Service, Statutes Supplement no. 138. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    18/132
    PAGE Tate v. Swan Hunter and Wigham Richardson, Ltd., [1958] 1 All E.R. 150; [1958] 1 W.L.R. 39; 102 Sol. Jo. 52; 56 L.G.R. 111, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. me is vi mi Ae 7.444, 25 Taylor v. Mark ‘Dawson & Son, Ltd., [r9orz | 11 3KB. 245% Soy 1) 6B. 108; £03 das Lee gS 5 be eb ee ayn ee 45, D.C.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1048, TOY), “n ae os ae wks 28 Taylor v. R. and H. Green and Silley Weir, Ltd. (1950), 84 LI.L.R. 570 E 24 Tennants (Lancaster), Ltd. v. C. S. Wilson & Co., Ltd., [1917] A.C.495; 86 L.J:K.B. 1191; 116 L:T.: 780; 33) T.L.R. 4543 (Oispolasio. 5750-23 Com. Cas. 41, H.L.; 12 Digest (Repl.) 449, 3387 ae nite ik m v 55 Theodore v. Duncan, [1919] A.C. 696; 88 L.J.P.C. 122; 121 L.T. 408; 35 Tala. ATVAink gI Thomas (Richard) and Baldwins, Ltd. v. ». Cummings, [1955] I ; ALE, R. 285; [1955] A.W 321) g@. Sok 19; 94; 53 L.G.R. 121, H.L.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1056, B23 shy & + ¥ cawZo, 20 Thompson v. Stimpson, [1960] 3 All ‘E. R. 500; [1961] 1 O.B. 195; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 818; 104 Sol. Jo. 951, C.A.; 3rd Digest Supp. A + 94940 64 Treacher & Co., Ltd. v. Treacher, [1874] 'W.N. 4; 43 Digest 60, 624 me) Turner v. Courtaulds, Ltd., [1937] 1 All E.R. 467; 81 Sol. Jo. 299 -+).G. 31/24 Digest (Repl.) 1043, T50 .. 34 Union of Whippingham and East Cowes Benefices, Re, Derham v. “Church Comrs. of England, [1954] 2 All E.R. 22; [1954] A.C. 245; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 804; 98 Sol. Jo. 268, P.C.; 19 Digest (Repl.) 4552802 |: - 51 University of London Press, Ltd. v. University Tutorial Press, Ltd., [1916] 2 Ch. 601; 86 L.J:Ch. 107; 115.L,17. 301; 32 1.L.R..698;7> 13 Digest (Repl.) 55.8 oi alte a a wu 7 — we on oi 95 Walter Wilson & Son, Ltd. v. Summerfield. See Wilson (Walter) & Son, Ltd. v. Summerfield. Watts v. Enfield Rolling Mills (Aluminium), Ltd., [1952] 1 All E.R. 1013; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 733, C.A.; 24 Digest (Repl.) 1074, 320 a Welham v. D.P.P., [1960] 1 ANLE.R. 805; [1961] A.C. 103; [1960]2 W.L. R. 669; 124 J.P. 280; 104 Sol. Jo. 308; 44 Cr. App. Rep. 124, H.L.; 3rd Digest Supp. oie as af wt Zs 81 Wellington Corpn. v. Lower Hutt Corpn., [1904] AG. 773; «72 In Tike G, SOS or. L.7.1§30}.20 TL? 9x2 Pia aw Digest 148, 158 38 Wheeler v. New Merton Board Mills, Ltd., [1933] 2 K.B. 669; [1933] ‘All be R. Rep. 28; 103 L.J.K.B,; 17; 149 eT 587; 49 T.L.R. 574 26 B.W.C.C. 230, C. A: 34 Digest (Repl.) 709, 4853 . 38 Wigley v. British Vinegars, Ltd., [1961] 3 All iB: R. 418; [1961] I Ww. L. R. 1261; 105 Sol. Jo. 666, C.A.; affirmed, [1962] 3 All E.R. 161; [1962] 3 W.L.R. 731; x06'Sol. Jo, 609; 6rL.Gik. ft, BL. ; ‘std Digest Supp. 25,28 Williams v. Howarth, [1905] A.C. 551; 74L.J. P.C. 115; 93 L.T. 115; 21 af See if R. 670, P.C.; 8 Digest (Repl.) 703; 772). gI Williams Brothers Direct Supply Stores, Ltd. v. Cloote (1944), 60 T. LR. 270, D.C.; 25 Digest (Repl.) 152, 636 82 Wilson v. Halifax Corpn. (1868), L.R. 3 Exch. II4; 37 L. 7: Ex. 443 17 Lit ap 660; 32 J.P. 230; 16 W.R. 707; 7 Digest (Repl.) 299, 208 76 Wilson (Walter) & Son, Ltd. v. Summerfield, [1956] 3 All E. R. 550, [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1429; 100 Sol. Jo. 840; [1956] 2 Lloyd’ s Rep. 275, D.C.; 3rd Digest Supp. 16 Yelland v. Powell Dufiryn Associated Collieries, Ltd., [1941] 1 All E. R. 278; [1941] 1 K.B. 154; 110 L.J.K.B. 404; 164 L.T. si 57) Isda Rs 92 $405 Sol. Jo. 177, C.A.; 33 Digest (Repl.) 891, r28r 7 aT ne 80