A digest of the law relating to public health and local government : with notes of 1073 leading cases, various official documents, precedents of by-laws and regulations, the statutes in full, a table of offences and punishments, ample indexes, &c / by George F. Chambers.
- George Frederick Chambers
- Date:
- 1875
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: A digest of the law relating to public health and local government : with notes of 1073 leading cases, various official documents, precedents of by-laws and regulations, the statutes in full, a table of offences and punishments, ample indexes, &c / by George F. Chambers. Source: Wellcome Collection.
149/556 page 127
![Paet II.] Digest of Cases. 1856. [317] Ellison's Estate, In re. Lands Clauses Act, 1845 — Costs of obtaining the payment of money out of Court. (25 L. J., Ch., 379: 8 De G., M. & G., 62 : 26 L. T. (o. s.), 267.) 1869. [318] Ferrar v. Commissioners of Sewers of London. Local Act— Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 68—Compen- sation—Construction of Local Act. (38 L. J., Ex., 102 : L. E., 4 Ex., 227: 21 L. T., 295.) I8S7- . . [319] Grosvenor (Lord) v. Hampstead JunctionRailway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 9^—Alms-houses partly buUt—Compulsory purchase of whole of site—Land held to be part of a house. (26 L. J., Ch., 731: I De G. & J., 446: 29 L. T. (o. s.), 319.) 1874- Earvie v. South Devon Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 92—Held that a pair of semi- detached Vnias could not be treated as one House, so as to involve purchase of both. (Times, Dec. 16, 1874-) 1865. [321] Herring v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Damage caused by the erection of a temporary hoarding for a pubKc purpose, e. g. diu-ing the construction of a sewer, is not such damage as will carry compensation. (Metropolis.) (34 L. J., M. C, 224: 19 C. B. (n.s.), 51°-) 1864. [322] Macey v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Compensation to Wharf- owner—Procedure. (33 L. J., Ch., 377 : 10 L. T., 66.) 1874- [323] M'Carthy v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 6&—Private Dock injuriously affected by the formation of an embankment— Compensation held payable. (43 L. J., C. P., 385 : 31 L. T., 183: 38 J. P., 820.) 1869. [324] Metropolitan Board of Works v. Metropolitan Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Damage to Sewer—Eight to lateral support of adjoining land —^Action held not maintaiQable. (38 L. J., C. P., 172 : L. E., 4 C. P., 192 : 19 L. T., 744.) 1859. [32s] North London Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Construction of sewer thi-ough land not scheduled for purchase, held intra vires. (Metro- polis.) (28 L. J., Ch., 909 : I Johns., 405 : 33 L. T. (o. s.), 383.) ■i8S4. [326] Pinchin v. London Sf Blackwall Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 92—Qucere, Is an easement land? (24L. J., Ch., 417: 5 De G-. M. & G., 851: 24L. T. (o.s.), 196.) 1874- [327] Quinton v. Bristol, Mayor. Lands Clauses Act, 1845 —Street Improvement—An Urban Sanitary Au- thority empowered to acquire lands, &c., compul- sorily may take whatever it includes in its notice, whether required or not: the restrictions put upon a railway company do not apply. (4^ L. J., Ch., 783: L. E., 17 Eq., 524: 30 L. T., 112: 38 J. P., SI6.) 1848. [328] Ramsden v. Manchester, South Junction ^ Altrincham Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Tres- pass—A public body must make compensation before entry, whether they purchase the land itself, or permanently occupy it. (i Ex., 723: 5 Eail. Cas., 552 : 10 L. T. (o. s.), 464.) 1862. [329] Jteddin v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 92—The sorting place of » Dust Contractor is not such a part of a Man- ufactory as to come within this section, (^i L. J., Ch., 660: 4 De G. F. & J., 532 : 7 L. T., 6.) 1852. [3.^0] Reg. V. Leeds Sj- Bradford Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, §§ 22 and 24— Jervis's Act, § 11— Compensation under 50I.—Order of Justices— Limitation of time. (21 L. J., M. C, 193: 19 L. T. (o. s.), 86: [EdMiundson, In re] 17 Q. B., 67.) •-1869. [331] Reg. V. Metropolitan Board of Wo7-ks. (3.) Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 68—Premises injm-iously affected—Injury to a landing place, and obstruc- tion to the right of taking water—Held that neither injury was a case for compensation. (^8 L. J., Q. B., 201: L. E., 4 Q. B., 358 : 10 B. & S., 39I-) 1872. [332] Reg. V. St. Luke's, Chelsea, Vestry. (2.) Eaising level of a Street—When a Local Act incorporates the whole of the Lands Clauses Act, 1845, the right of compensation to parties whose lands are taken follows as a matter of course. (41 L. J., Q. B., 81: L. E., 7 Q. B., 148: 25 L. T., 914.) .1867. [3.33] Rickett V. Metropolitan Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845, § 68—Construction of Works—A tem- porary oijstruction of Highway although involviag loss of trade does not entitle to compensation. —There must be an injury to land or to an interest in land. (36 L. J., Q. B., 205 : L. E., 2 H. L., 175 : 16 L. T., 542.) 1873- [,3.U] Souch V. East-London Railway Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—A cul-de-sac dedicated to the public is for this purpose a pubHc street, and there need be neither notice nor compensation. (42 L. J., Ch., 477 : L. E., 16 Eq., 108.) 1870. [335 ] Stebhing v. Metropolitan Board of Works. Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Grave-yard—Compensation is payable on the actual value of land considered as depreciated by the purpose to which it is applied, and is not to be estimated at what would be the value of such land supposing it had been secularised, (Metropolis.) (40 L. J., Q. B., i: L. E., 6 Q. B., 37: 23 L. T., 530.) 1858. [336] Ware v. Regents Canal Co. Lands Clauses Act, 1845 —Compensation—An occasional flooding of lands caused by the proper execution of Parliamentary powers is within § 68. (28 L. J., Ch., 153: 3'De G. & J., 212: 32 L. T. (o.s.), 136.) 1862. [337] Wedmore v. Bristol, Mayor. Local Acts incorporating the Lands Clauses Act, 1845—Eaising of Foot-way—Injunction refused, but the plaintiff to have damages awarded him. (i New Eep., 120 and 187: 7L. T., 459: 11 W. E., 136.) Legal Proceeding's. (l.) GENERAL. 1874- [.3.^8] Andrews v. Ryde, Mayor. Local Government Act, 1858, § 24—Municipal Cor[3oration acting as a Local Board—Action for work and labour as a professional witness—Held that as the action was against the Corporation qua Local Board, the Corporation was liable without being otherwise or more expressly described. (43 L. J., Ex., 174: L. E., 9 Ex., 302.) 1873- C3.39] Bolingbroke (Lord) v. Townsend. If a plaintiff by inad- vertence sues the Clerk of a Local Board instead of the Board, the writ may be amended. (42](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b20386643_0149.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
