Reports and papers on suspected cases of human plague in East Suffolk and on an epizootic of plague in rodents.

  • Great Britain. Local Government Board.
Date:
1911
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: Reports and papers on suspected cases of human plague in East Suffolk and on an epizootic of plague in rodents. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by Royal College of Physicians, London. The original may be consulted at Royal College of Physicians, London.

    8/108
    and forwarding the rats were undertaken by Drs. Hulstrode, i^’letcher, and Reece. The rats were sent to Ipswich, wliere they were received and particulars tabulated by Mr. C. .1. lluddart on behalf of the Board. The examination of rats was entrusted to Urs. Petrie and Macalister, of the Lister Institute, and was carried out at a laboratory which had been gratuitously placed at the disposal of the Board by the Ipswich Town Council, and prepared for the purpose by ])r. Pringle, medical officer of health of that borough. The system of examination adopted consisted of a primary po.st-mortem examination of each rat. If any suspicious signs were visible, a bacteriological examination was made; and if this did not enable a negative diagnosis as regards plague to be made, the examination was remitted to the Lister Institute for more complete experiments. 'riie report by Drs. Petrie and MacAlister on their laboratory work is given on page 56; and on page 86 will be found a tabulated summary of the number and sources of rats examined, which has been prej)ared from Mi-. FluddarPs records. This tahulated summary should be considered in connection with the map facing this page. Altogether 6,071 rats wer<* leceived from urban districts, and from 301 parishes in 15 rural districts. Of this number 6,017 were declared negative on post-mortem examination, 43 on further cultural tests at Ipswich, and 8 after further examina- tion at the Lister Institute. The remaining 3 rats, which did not manifest very suspicious features on post-mortem examination, yielded on culture an organism similar to bacillus pestis. This bacillus on further examination (see page 61) is regarded as the bacillus pseudo-tuberculosis rodentium. The diagrammatic map facing this page shows clearly the area under observation in this delimiting experiment, and the position of the parishes from whiidi rats were obtained for examination. Scientific Wokk on Rat Fleas. A report is included (pages 41 to 55) by Drs. C. -1. Martin and Sydney Rowland, of the Lister Institute, on epizootic plague in East Anglia, with special reference to the fleas infesting rodents. As is well known, the chief flea infesting the ordinary black rat of India is the Xenopsylla c/ieopis, which readily bites man. No black rats w-ere found in Suffolk; and the exami- nation of the brown rats showed that they are infested with about equal numbers of two species of fleas, Cerafoph tjllns fasciatus and Ctenopthalmus agyrtes. Of these, the former readily bites man; and Dr. Martin found the bacillus pe.stis in the stomachs of some fleas of this species removed from i)lague-infected rats. ITe second kind of flea does not readily bite man. It is noteworthy also that the number of fleas was small. From 568 rats examined, only 584 fleas were obtained. Omitting the Ctenopthalmus agyrtes, which does not seem to bite man, the effective prevalence in East Anglia is only about one flea to two rats. This, as Dr. Martin points out, “is an infesta- tion Avhich was not found sufficient to give rise to a human