Volume 2
T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex / with notes and a translation by H.A.J. Munro.
- Lucretius
- Date:
- 1900-1910
Licence: In copyright
Credit: T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex / with notes and a translation by H.A.J. Munro. Source: Wellcome Collection.
83/316 page 67
No text description is available for this image
No text description is available for this image
No text description is available for this image![quam Grai memorant nec nostra dicere lingua concedit nobis patrii sermonis egestas, sed tamen ipsam rem faciles& exponere verbis. principio, rerum quom dicit homoeomerian, ossa videlicet e pauxillis atque minutis 835 ossibus hie et de pauxillis atque minutis visceribus viseus gigni sanguenque creari sanguinis inter se multis coeuntibu' guttis ex aurique putat micis consistere posse aurum et de terris terram concrescere parvis, 840 ignibus ex ignis, umorem umoribus esse, cetera consimili fingit ratione putatque. nee tamen esse ulla parte idem in rebus inane concedit neque corporibus finem esse secandis. quare in utraque mihi pariter ratione videtur 845 errare atque illi, supra quos diximus ante. adde quod inbecilla nimis primordia fingit ; si primordia sunt, simili quae praedita constanf natura atque ipsae res sunt aequeque laborant et pereunt neque ab exitio res ulla refrenat. 850 nam quid in oppressu valido durabit eorum, ut mortem effugiat, leti sub dentibus ipsis ? ignis an umor an aura? quid horum? sanguen an ossa? gives & far-fetched interpretation, because he says Lucr. could not use et for etiam. 834 quom Lach. for quam. Lamb. reads Principium rerum quam and joins it with what precedes: he is followed by all before Lach. and may be right. *quid quod ita ne dixit quidem usquam Lucretius, sed rerum principia ri 740 1047 n 789' says Lach. Yes, because his primordia are plural; but r 707 he writes Et qui principium gignundis aera rebus Constituere of those who have one first-beginning of things. 835 e Pont. Mar. Ald. 1 Junt. for de. 839 840 aurique...aurum: as he immediately enumerates the three other ele- menís, Bentl. proposes auraeque...awram. *quid hie aurum? oculos credo inter- pretum praestrinxit...Simplie. tamen [in Arist. phys. fol. 6 b] de Anaxag. mávra Tà Onotouepf otov rà ÜOwp T TÜp 7) xpvoóv etc. 'This and other passages seem to defend the text: see notes 2: yet comp. 853. 841 ignis, wmorem. ignem, umorem ez Lamb. and the plur. is awkward. 843 ulla parte idem Nicc. vulgo for ulla idem parte. ulla idem ez parte Lach. because Lucr. he says only omits the preposition when a genitive is added; but im rebus seems equivalent to one: comp. Juven. v1 427 Adque alia parte in trutina suspendit Homerum. —— 840 illi supra quos marg. Flor. 32 Ald.1 Junt. for illis wira quod A, quo B Gott. illis juxta quod Camb. Vat. 1954 Othob. viris óuzta quos Flor. 31 illis iuxta, Ang. Politian in marg. Flor. 29. 847 inbecilla Flor. 31 Camb. for inbecilia. 852 effugiat B corr. Flor. 81 5—2](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b24880164_0002_0083.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)