The parish registers of Gatton, co. Surrey / transcribed and edited by W. Bruce Bannerman.

Date:
1908
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: The parish registers of Gatton, co. Surrey / transcribed and edited by W. Bruce Bannerman. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    25/94 (page 5)
    Bapt. Mary Flint the daughter of Richard Flint was baptized the first of April 1616. Bury Hellen Cox the daughter of Alexander Cox was buryed the 9th of Aprill 1616. Bury Roger Doverdale (poore man) was buryed the vij of J une 1616. Bapt. Margret the daughter of Edward Shove was baptised the first day of Decembe1' 1616.* Bur: Judith the wife of John Tylor was buried the vl day of Januarie i6r6. Bapt: Hellen the daughter of Richard Brimsted was baptised the .... day of F . . . . Marr: Richard Sho . . e and Ane Be ... . [w]ere marr[ied] the vi. . of April 1617. John Rambridge [?] and .... Michell . . re m . ried the xi . . day of July 1617. Bur. 1618 William the sohe of William Cop . ey [Copley] J ..r [Junr] was buried . . . . th day of . . . . 1618. Burr. Margret the .... of Edward Shove .... Mistres Shelton was Buried in December .... [This entry is interlined.—Ed.] Bapt. Hunnesse Tyler the sone of John Tyler .... baptised . . . vii day of ... . Bapt. Sarah the daughter . . Edward Shov[e] was baptised .... Elizabeth the daughter of Richard Flint was bap . . . ed the xiiijth day of ... . Elizabeth daughter of Richard Brimsteed was baptised the xij day of ... . 1618. Edward Shove, Rector. Richard Brimsted, Churchwarden. [Page 7.] 1619. Bur. Magdalene the wife of William Copley senir, Esquire, was buried the 16th [owing to a correction the date cannot be correctly ascertained, ?6 or x 6th.—Ed.] day of August A110 jidict. Bur. John Copley, Gent., was buried the vith [altered from xix. —Ed.] day of December [November erased.^—Ed.] Aho fdict. M.I.f John Shorrie [?] & Marie Pollard were married the third of June 1629. [This entry has been interlined.— Ed.] Bur. Elizabeth the Daughter of Richard Flint was buried the 4 day of Nouemb: 1620. # From this point the remaining entries on page 6 are extremely difficult to decipher owing to the damp having caused the surface of the parchment to peel off. Readers must verify these entries for themselves.—Ed. f Vide Manning and Bray’s “ History of Surrey,” vol. ii.