Teratogenesis : an inquiry into the causes of monstrosities. History of the theories of the past / by J.W. Ballantyne.
- Date:
- 1897
Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: Teratogenesis : an inquiry into the causes of monstrosities. History of the theories of the past / by J.W. Ballantyne. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The original may be consulted at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.
51/68
![Bibliography. [This bibliography must not be regarded as exhaustive ; to have made it so would have entailed the naming of almost every text-book in Midwifery, Pediatrics, Dermatology, and Surgery.] 1. Kerckringius (T.).—“ Monstrum cacodaemonis picturae, quam liumanae figurae similius.” In his Specilegium anatomicum, obs. xxiii. p. 56, 1670. illustrated. Also, “ Imaginationis prodigium,” Ibid., obs. Ixiv. p. 129. Illustrated. 2. Swammerdam (J.).— Uteri muliebris fabrica, p. 29, Leidae, 1672. 3. Malebraxche (N.).—Recherche de la vdritd, lib. ii., c. 7, Paris, 1674. 4. Fidelis (F.).—De relationibus medicorum, lib. iii., c. 4, p. 405, Lipsiae, 1674. 5. Bartholixus (T.). —“ Gravidarum imaginatio,” Acta med. etphil., 1673, Hafn., ii. pp. 1-3, 1675. 6. Ludovici (D. D.).—“ De singulari gravidae imaginatione et rostro leporino singulari,” Mice. Acad. nat. curios., 1673-4, Francof. et Lips., Ann. iv.-v., obs. 208, pp. 293-295, 1676. 7. Segerus (G.).—“ Gangraena ex terrore materno embryoni impressa,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1673-4, Francof. et Lips., Ann. iv. v., obs. 147, p. 153, 1676. 8. Mercklixcs (G. A.).—“ De gravidae imaginatione foetui noxia,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1677, Yratisl. et Bregae, viii., obs. 46, pp. 73-75, 1678. 9. Bayle (F.).—Dissertationes medicae, etc., Diss. iii. p. 116, Hagae-Comitis, 1678. 10. Blegxy (N. de).—“ Vires imaginationis in gravida,” Zodiacus med -gall., 1679, Geneva, i. p. 61, 1680 ; “ De viribus imaginationis in praegnante, aliud exemplum,” Ibid., p. 62. 11. Sommerus (J. G.).—“Imaginationis effectus ex terrore matris in recens nato notatus,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1682, Norimb., dec. 2, i. p. 113 1683. 12. Cuchotius.—“ De vi imaginationis in gravida et foetu monstroso,” Zodia- cus med.-gall., 1683, Geneva, v. p. 249, 1685. 13. Diemerbroeck (I. de).—Opera omnia. Anat., lib. i., c. 28, p. 1656, Utrecht 1685. 14. Albrecht (J. P.).—“ De imaginatione gravidarum,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1687, Norimb., dec. 2, Ann. vi., obs. 14, p. 40, 1688. 15. Fehries (J. L.).—“De imaginatione forti in gravidis feetui plurimum noxia,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1687, Norimb., dec. 2, Ann. vi obs 30 p. 84, 1688. 16. Gockelius (E.).—“Infans ex fortissima matris imaginatione, monstrosa Umbilici relaxatione ac intestinorum extra Corpus propendentium pro- lapsu, natus,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1687, Norimb., dec 2 Ann vi obs. 126, p. 263, 1688. 17. Dol/EUS (J.).—Encyclopedia chirurgica, Francofurti, 1689. 18. Hoffmaxxus (J. M.).—“De feetu monstroso ex imaginatione matris,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1689, Norimb., dec. 2, viii p 483-485 1690 Illustrated. ’ 19. Sixibaldus (J.).—“ An Parentum imaginatio ad feetus generationem con- currat Problema,” in his Apollo Bifrons, p. 133, Romae, 1690. 20. Lextilids (R.).—“De ictu bombardae et gladii, proli per impressionem matris iinpacto,” Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1694, Lips, et Francof, dec 3. ii., obs. 117, pp. 176-181, 1695. ’ 21. Baxdiera (G. G.).—“ Delle voMie che s’imprimono nel feto rinchiuso nell’ utero, etc.,” Galleria di Minerva, iii., pt. 4, p. 101, Venezia, 1695.](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b21981000_0053.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)