Teratogenesis : an inquiry into the causes of monstrosities. History of the theories of the past / by J.W. Ballantyne.

Date:
1897
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Teratogenesis : an inquiry into the causes of monstrosities. History of the theories of the past / by J.W. Ballantyne. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The original may be consulted at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

    53/68
    44. Superville (D. de).—“ Some Reflections on Generation, and on Mon- sters, with a Description of some particular Monsters,” Philos. Trans., xli. (for 1740), pt. 1. No. 456, p. 306, London, 1744. 45. Gregory (W.).—“An account of a monstrous Foetus, resembling a hooded monkey,” Philos. Trans., xli. (for 1741), pt. 2, No. 461, p. 764, London 1744. 46. Woensel (J. van).—“ De vitiosa digitorum conformatione ex praegnantis matris terrore,” Acta Acad. nat. curios., vi. p. 243, Norimb., 1742. 47. Huber (J. J.).—“ De miris vis externae ac imprimis imaginationis in mulieres gravidas indeque in embryones effectibus,” Cassel, 1743. 48. Bellett (I.).—“ Lettres sur le pouvoir de l’imagination des femmes enceintes. Ou l’on combat le prejuge qui attribue a l’imagination des m&res le pouvoir d’imprimer sur le corps des enfans renfermes dans leur sein la figure des objets qui les ont frapp^s,” Paris, 1745. 49. Boerhaave (H.).—“ Praelectiones academicae in proprias institutiones,” (edition by A. von Haller), iv., pt. 2, p. 261, Taurini, 1742-45. 50. Nicolai (E. A.).—“ Gedancken von der Erzeugung des Kindes im Mut- terleibe,” Halle, 1746. 51. Andriessen (J. J.). —“De maternarum imaginationum et animi pathe- matumin fcetum efficacia,” Dissertation, Traj. ad Rhenum, 1748. 52. Huber (J. J.).—“ Observationes atque cogitationesnonnullae de monstris,” Cassel, 1748. 53. Maternus de Cilano (G. C.).—“ De foetu cum duabus cotyledonibus vertici adnatis excluso,” Acta Acad. nat. curios., viii., p. 343, Norimb., 1748. 54. Nicolai (E. A.).—“ Gedancten von der Erzeugung der Misgeburthen und Mondkalber,” p. 64, Halle, 1749. 55. Plancus (J.).—“De monstris ac monstrosis quibusdam, etc.,” Venetiis, 1749. 56. Haller (A. von).—“Descriptio fetus bicipitis,” in Opuscula sua ana- tomica, p. 150, Gottingae, 1751. 57. Smellie (W.).—“Treatise of Midwifery,” ii., cases 89 and 90, London, 1754. 58. Roederer (J. G.).—“ De vi imaginationis in fcetum negato quando gravi- dae mens a causa quacunque violentiore commovetur,” St Petersburg, 1756. 59. Krause (K. C.).—“ Quaenam sit causa proxima mutans corpus foetus, non matris gravidae, hujus mente a causa quadarn violentiore commota,” St Petersburg, 1756. (German translation by Wichmann, under title “ Abhandlung von den Muttermalern,” in 1758.) 60. Corvelli (G. S.).—“An stigmata foetus a phantasia matris,” Pisis, 1757. 61. Ludwig (C. G.).—[Pr.] de fallaci judicio vulgi super vi imaginationis maternae in foetum,” Lipsiae [1759]. 62. Vari (I.).—“ Ragionamento in aggiunta alia Dissertazione,” del Signor G. Blonde!, p. 175, Ferrara, 1760. 63. Morgagni (J. B.).—“ De sedibus et causis morborum ” Epist. 48, Yenetiis, 1761. r 64. Anonymous.—“ Effects of imagination on pregnant women disproved, in a letter from an eminent physician to a married lady,” Gentleman’s Mag. and Hist. Chron., xxxiv., p. 455, London, 1764. 65. Anonymous.—“ Letters on the force of the imagination in pregnant women. Wherein it is proved, by incontestible arguments, drawn from both reason and experience, that it is a ridiculous prejudice to suppose it possible for a pregnant woman to mark her child with the figure of any object she has longed for.” London, 1765. 66. Haller (A. von).—Elementa Physiologiae, viii., lib. 29. p. 129, Bern. 1766. ’ 1 ’ 67. Kaltschmied (C. F.).—“ [Pr.] de embryone hernioso trium mensium,” Jenae [1767]. G