Hugh Miller / by W. Keith Leask.

  • William Keith Leask
Date:
[pref. 1896]
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Hugh Miller / by W. Keith Leask. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    81/168 page 77
    of their own invention. There is something in the Scottish intellect, in this resembling the French, that seeks for the completest realisation in detail of its ideas. As Professor Masson has said, its dominant note is really not caution, with which it is so frequently credited, but e7nphasis. While the English Independents during the later years of the Civil War appear as either sectaries or as individualists, the contention of the Scots was ever for a national system. This feature in the char- acter of the nation is really at the root of what Hallam calls the ‘ Presbyterian Hildebrandism ’ of the elder MUrie. Johnson, too, could with some considerable truth say to Boswell, ‘You are the only instance of a Scotchman that I have known who did not at every other sentence bring in some other Scotchman.’ But this is the very feature that Buckle has overlooked, and it is this that explains how the new church spoke in the authori- tative tones of the old; this, too, which explains how, outside of the waning Episcopalian sect, there are no dis- senters in Scotland in the true sense. We have parties, not sects. While the Secession, the Relief, the Cameronians, the Burghers were all mere branches of the parent stock, retaining in detail its fundamental nature in discipline and worship, the established church in England finds it- self face to face with organised and hostile dissent. So entirely has the national unity been preserved in Scotland that Professor Blackie has said, with no less truth than pith, that while Presbyterianism is the national and the rational dress of the land, Episcopacy is but the dress coat by which
    digitised image 1
    digitised image 2
    digitised image 3