Heywood & Massey's lunacy practice / by N. Arthur Heywood, Arnold S. Massey and Ralph C. Romer.

  • Heywood, N. Arthur (Nathaniel Arthur)
Date:
1907
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: Heywood & Massey's lunacy practice / by N. Arthur Heywood, Arnold S. Massey and Ralph C. Romer. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by King’s College London. The original may be consulted at King’s College London.

    21/708 (page 17)
    PAGE Han-is, Re (1880), 49 L. J. Oh. 327 - - - 506 Harrod v. Harrod (1854), 1 K. & J. 4; 18 Jui-. (0. S.) 853 ; 2 W. K. 612 - - - - - - - - 252 Hartley v. GUbert (1843), 13 Sim. 596 - - - - 237 Hartley v. Pendarves, [1901] 2 Ch. 498; 70 L. J. Oh. 745 ; 85 L. T. 64; 50 W. R. 56 - - - - - ^^45 Harvey v. Rex, [1901] A. 0. 601; 70 L. J. P. C. 107; 84 L. T. 849; 17 T. L. R. 601 - - - - - - 359, 508 Harwood (1887), 35 0. D. 470; 56 L. J. Ch. 974; 56 L. T. 502; 36 W. R. 27 - 193, 343 Harwood v. Baker (1840), 3 Moore, P. C. 282 . - - 257 Harwood f. Hackney Guardians (1898), 14 T. L. R. 307; 62 J. P. 227 ------ - 288, 436 Hastings, In the Goods of (1877), 4 P. D. 73; 47 L. J. P. 30; 39 L. T. 45 - - - - - - - - 241 Hastings, Ex parte (1807), 14 Yes. 182; 9 R. R. 272 - - 249 Healing v. Heahng (1902), 51 W. R. 221; 19 T. L. R. 90 - - 17 Hendon Guardians v. Hampstead (1893), 62 L. J. M. 0. 170; 37 Sol. Jo. 717 419 Hewitson, Ex parte (1852), 1 W. R. 58 - - - - 528 Hewitson v. Sherwin (1870), 10 Eq. 53; 18 W. R. 802 - - 533 Higginson v. Hall (1879), 10 C. D. 235; 48 L. J. Oh. 250; 39 L. T. 603; 27 W. R. 469 - - - - - - 236 Hilbert, Ex parte (1805), 11 Ves. 397 _ _ - 117,519 Hill, Re (1863), 1 De G. J. & S. 487; 7 L. T. 702; 11 W. R. 296; 1 N, R. 250 - - - - - - - 523 Hill, Re (1900), 1 Ir. Rep. Ch. 349 - - - - 188, 353 Hill V. Philp (1852), 7 Exch. 232; 21 L. J. Exch. 82; 16 Jur. (0. S.) 90 - - - - - - - - 546 Hillman v. WhitEeld. See Reg. v. Whitfield. Hinchcliffe, Re, [1895] 1 Ch. 117; 64 L. J. Ch. 76; 71 L. T. 532; 43 W. R. 82; (1894) W. N. 179 516 HinchclifYe, Re (1895), W. N. 147 ; 73 L. T. 522 - 229, 234, 330 Hinds, Re (1877), 7 C. D. 26; 37 L. T. 768; 26 W. R. 193 - - 336 Hirst, Re (1892), W. N. 177 ; 67 L. T. 702; 2 R. 409 - - 340 Hitchon, Re (1845), 15 L. J. Ch. 126 . _ . . 519 Hodsoa V. Pare, [1899] 1 Q. B. 455; 68 L. J. Q. B. 309; 80 L. T. 13; 47 W. R. 241; 15 T. L. R. 171 - - - -274 Hole, Re, Davies v. Witts, [1905] 2 Ch. 385; 74 L. J. Ch. 689; 93 L. T. 153; 54 W. R. 73 338 Hole, Re, Davies v. Witts, [1906] 1 Ch. 673 - - - - 338 Holland (1881), 16 0. D. 672; 50 L. J. Ch. 271; 44 L. T. 561; 29 W. R. 449 - - - - - - 212, 353 Holyland, Re (1805), 11 Ves. 9; 8 R. R. 67 - - - - 500 Hoops V. Lord Kingston (1848), 11 Ir. Rep. Eq. 469 - - - 525 Hope V. Campbell, [1899] A. C. 1 - - - - - 267 Hopper, Re (1897), 66 L. J. Ch. 569; 77 L. T. 154 - - - 605 Horn V. Anglo-Australian and Universal Family Life Insurance Co. (1861), 30 L. J. Ch. 511; 4 L. T. 142; 9 W. R. 359; 7 Jur. 673 - 250 H.M. b