An answer to the Reverend Dr. Middleton's grand objection to the Lord Bishop of London's interpretation of Moses's History of the fall. Wherein it is shewn, That that Part of this History which relates to the Serpent, in this Interpretation, is not Allegory or mere Metaphor, but just and proper Expression, agreeable to Scripture-Language, and universal Custom in all Languages, in like Cases. By a clergyman

  • Clergyman
Date:
1750
  • E-books
  • Online

About this work

Also known as

Answer to the Reverend Dr. Middleton's grand objection to the Lord Bishop of London's interpretation of Moses's History of the fall. Wherein it is shewn, That that Part of this History which relates to the Serpent, in this Interpretation, is not Allegory or mere Metaphor, but just and proper Expression, agreeable to Scripture-Language, and universal Custom in all Languages, in like Cases. By a clergyman (Online)
An answer to the Reverend Dr. Middleton's grand objection to the Lord Bishop of London's interpretation of Moses's History of the fall. Wherein it is shewn, That that Part of this History which relates to the Serpent, in this Interpretation, is not Allegory or mere Metaphor, but just and proper Expression, agreeable to Scripture-Language, and universal Custom in all Languages, in like Cases. By a

Publication/Creation

London : printed for W. Owen, at Homer's Head, near Temple-Bar, 1750

Series

Contributors

Languages

Subjects

Holdings

  • Full text available: 1750.
Available in Eighteenth Century Collections Online.

Permanent link